Greene cites high US costs for Mexico stem cell therapy

2 min read     Updated on 18 Jun 2026, 12:42 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Radhika SScanX News Team
AI Summary

Marjorie Taylor Greene traveled to Mexico for stem cell therapy due to high U.S. costs and lack of FDA approval. She cited $27,000 annual insurance costs for a family of four as an example. Data shows U.S. healthcare affordability hit a five-year low in 2025.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
43312341

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Marjorie Taylor Greene disclosed on Wednesday that she traveled to Mexico for stem cell therapy, citing high U.S. healthcare costs and lack of regulatory approval as primary reasons. The former Congresswoman stated in a post on X that she does not have health insurance and highlighted that rising costs are driving Americans to seek medical treatments abroad. Greene noted that the specific therapy she received is not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which contributed to her decision to go overseas.

Greene provided specific figures to illustrate the financial burden of healthcare in the United States. She stated that a family of four can spend up to $27,000 annually on health insurance, with additional deductibles ranging from $7,000 to $10,000. "Health insurance is absurdly expensive," Greene said, emphasizing the financial strain on households.

Her comments align with new data from Gallup and West Health indicating that healthcare affordability in the U.S. has fallen to its lowest level in five years. The survey revealed that only 49% of U.S. adults could consistently afford quality healthcare and prescription drugs in 2025, a decline from 61% in 2022. The data further showed that approximately 2.8 million more Americans struggled to afford healthcare in 2025 compared to the previous year.

The Gallup survey identified specific demographics facing the most significant affordability challenges, including young adults, women, Black and Hispanic Americans, and individuals with chronic or mental health conditions. Concern regarding future costs is also prevalent, with 51% of Americans expressing worry about paying for healthcare services and 42% concerned about affording prescription drugs.

Costs are projected to continue rising for insured individuals as well. Employer health benefit costs are expected to increase 6.7% in 2026 to at least $18,500 per employee, marking the largest annual increase in 15 years. Large employers anticipate raising deductibles, copays, and out-of-pocket costs, while prescription drug benefit costs are projected to rise around 9% in 2026.

Metric Value
Family of four annual insurance cost $27,000
Family deductibles range $7,000 - $10,000
Adults able to afford healthcare (2025) 49%
Adults able to afford healthcare (2022) 61%
Additional Americans struggling (2025 vs 2024) 2.8 million
Projected employer benefit cost increase (2026) 6.7%
Cost per employee (2026) $18,500
Projected prescription drug cost increase (2026) 9%

Will the rising trend of Americans seeking medical treatments abroad force U.S. regulators to reconsider approval processes for alternative therapies?

How might the projected 6.7% increase in employer health benefit costs impact wage growth and hiring in 2026?

Could the decline in healthcare affordability to a five-year low drive significant legislative reform ahead of the next election cycle?

like20
dislike

Trump criticizes past leaders on semiconductor policy

0 min read     Updated on 18 Jun 2026, 11:46 AM
scanx
Reviewed by
Shriram SScanX News Team
AI Summary

Former President Donald Trump used his Truth Social platform to criticize past US leaders for allowing the semiconductor industry to move overseas. He attributed the shift to a lack of protective tariffs and argued that American technology leadership needs to be restored through domestic manufacturing.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
43308963

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Former President Donald Trump criticized previous US administrations for their handling of the semiconductor industry, stating that the failure to implement tariffs allowed foreign nations to dominate manufacturing. In a post on Truth Social, Trump argued that the technology the world relies on was invented in America, but "stupid presidents" allowed the industry to move to places like Taiwan.

Trump highlighted the historical significance of American innovation, referencing the "Intel Inside" era. He asserted that past leaders took the economy for granted and neglected to protect industries with trade policies such as tariffs.

The post linked to the specific statement on his social media platform, where he reiterated his stance on bringing manufacturing back to the United States. Trump claimed that his victory in the recent election signaled a clear mandate to rebuild the domestic semiconductor sector.

Key Statements

  • Origin of Technology: Trump stated that the foundational technology was invented in America.
  • Policy Criticism: He blamed the loss of factories on the absence of protective tariffs.
  • Future Goal: Trump emphasized the necessity of restoring the American semiconductor industry.

How might the implementation of new tariffs on foreign semiconductors impact global supply chains and consumer electronics prices?

What specific incentives or policies could the U.S. government introduce to accelerate the reshoring of semiconductor manufacturing?

How will major semiconductor companies, particularly those with significant operations in Taiwan, respond to potential shifts in U.S. trade policy?

like20
dislike

More News on United States

Must Read Next

Earnings

Corporate Actions

Stocks