Nasdaq 100 up 200% since Feb 2020, but 10 mega-caps still trade lower
Despite the Nasdaq 100 rising over 200% since February 2020, 10 mega-cap firms worth over $100 billion, including Alibaba, Boeing, and Disney, trade below pre-Covid levels due to regulatory, operational, and sector-specific headwinds.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Global equities have recovered significantly since the sharp selloff triggered by the pandemic in early 2020, with the Nasdaq 100 climbing more than 200% from its February 2020 level. However, a distinct group of 10 mega-cap companies, each still valued above $100 billion, are trading below their pre-Covid prices. This performance gap underscores the impact of sector-specific headwinds and regulatory challenges on even the largest established firms.
A screen of companies with a market value above $100 billion from Feb. 15, 2020, through June 17, 2026, reveals that some of the world's most recognized brands are among the worst performers. While the broader market has rallied to record highs, these companies have struggled to regain their previous valuation levels due to a variety of structural and operational issues.
Worst-performing mega-caps since February 2020
The following table details the 10 companies that have failed to recover to their February 2020 price levels, despite the overall market surge.
| Company | Ticker | Performance Status |
|---|---|---|
| Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. | NYSE: BABA | Down about 51% |
| The Boeing Co. | NYSE: BA | Down roughly 34% |
| Medtronic plc | NYSE: MDT | Close behind Boeing |
| The Walt Disney Co. | NYSE: DIS | 15% to 28% underwater |
| Pfizer Inc. | NYSE: PFE | 15% to 28% underwater |
| AT&T Inc. | NYSE: T | 15% to 28% underwater |
| Verizon Communications Inc. | NYSE: VZ | 15% to 28% underwater |
| Salesforce Inc. | NYSE: CRM | 15% to 28% underwater |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | NYSE: BMY | 15% to 28% underwater |
| HDFC Bank Ltd. | NYSE: HDB | 15% to 28% underwater |
Sector-specific challenges drive divergence
The underperformance of these giants is attributed to specific company and sector factors rather than broad market sentiment. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. has faced years of regulatory crackdowns in Beijing and slowing consumption in China. The Boeing Co. has been unable to escape the shadow of the 737 MAX crisis, compounded by fresh quality and production issues that have impacted cash flow.
In the pharmaceutical sector, Pfizer Inc. saw a significant collapse in vaccine and antiviral revenue as the pandemic faded, while Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. is navigating a "patent cliff" involving expirations on its major drugs. Telecommunications giants AT&T Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc. are constrained by heavy debt loads and a saturated wireless market characterized by scarce growth and price wars.
Historical parallels in market performance
The current situation mirrors historical instances where blue-chip stocks lagged behind index rallies. In March 2000, at the peak of the dot-com bubble, Cisco Systems Inc. became the most valuable company globally but took 26 years to reclaim that high. Similarly, Microsoft Corp. required over 15 years to climb back above its 1999 peak while the S&P 500 doubled. The pattern suggests that even in a roaring market, specific cohorts of former leaders can remain stagnant until new growth narratives emerge.
What specific catalysts are required for these mega-cap laggards to establish new growth narratives?
Could the prolonged underperformance of these blue-chip stocks trigger a shift in index composition or passive investment flows?
How might the heavy debt loads of telecom giants like AT&T and Verizon impact their ability to invest in AI infrastructure compared to peers?





























