Zuari Industries submits revised code for fair disclosure of UPSI
Zuari Industries Limited has updated its internal governance framework by filing a revised Code of Practices for Fair Disclosure of Unpublished Price Sensitive Information. The new code, effective August 13, 2026, strengthens compliance with SEBI's insider trading regulations by defining clear roles for Chief Investor Relations Officers and outlining strict protocols for handling UPSI. It emphasizes prompt public disclosure, uniform dissemination via stock exchanges and the company website, and rigorous controls on interactions with analysts and external parties. The revision supersedes the previous code to ensure alignment with current regulatory standards.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Zuari Industries has submitted its revised Code of Practices and Procedures for Fair Disclosure of Unpublished Price Sensitive Information (UPSI) to the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd and BSE Limited. The filing, dated August 13, 2026, ensures compliance with Regulation 8 of the SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015, as amended.
The Board of Directors approved the revised code, which supersedes the previous version adopted by the company. The update aims to ensure timely, adequate, fair, uniform, and universal dissemination of UPSI to prevent selective disclosure.
Key Provisions of the Revised Code
The revised code outlines specific responsibilities and procedures for handling sensitive information:
- Chief Investor Relations Officers (CIROs): The Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary serve as CIROs. They are responsible for ensuring timely and uniform dissemination of UPSI to avoid selective disclosure.
- Prompt Disclosure: The company must make prompt public disclosure of UPSI that impacts price discovery once credible and concrete information comes into being.
- Uniform Dissemination: UPSI must be promptly intimated to stock exchanges and disclosed on the company’s website.
- Handling Inadvertent Disclosure: If UPSI is disclosed selectively or inadvertently, the responsible person must inform the CIROs immediately. The CIROs must then take prompt action to disseminate the information publicly.
- Interaction with Analysts: Authorized personnel may share only generally available information with analysts and investors. Transcripts or records of such meetings must be made available on the company’s website.
Legitimate Purpose and Confidentiality
The code defines "legitimate purpose" as sharing UPSI in the ordinary course of business with collaborators, lenders, customers, suppliers, merchant bankers, legal advisors, auditors, credit rating agencies, and other service providers. Such sharing must not be carried out to evade regulatory prohibitions.
Factors considered for legitimate sharing include:
- Whether the sharing is in the ordinary course of business.
- Whether it serves the interests of the company or a genuine commercial purpose.
- Whether the nature of the UPSI is commensurate with the purpose.
Recipients of UPSI under a legitimate purpose are considered insiders and must maintain confidentiality. They are prohibited from dealing in the company’s securities or advising others to trade while in possession of such information.
Review and Amendment
The Board will review the code as necessary and amend it to reflect changes in the SEBI PIT Regulations or other applicable laws. In case of inconsistency between the code and SEBI regulations, the regulatory provisions shall prevail.
Historical Stock Returns for Zuari Industries
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.59% | -0.63% | -3.68% | -5.21% | -17.53% | +76.71% |
How might Zuari Industries' strengthened UPSI disclosure protocols influence investor confidence and stock liquidity in the near term?
Could the dual appointment of the CFO and Company Secretary as CIROs create operational bottlenecks or enhance oversight efficiency during market volatility?
What potential penalties or regulatory scrutiny could arise if inadvertent disclosures occur despite these new procedural safeguards?


































