Winamp subsidiary Jamendo sues Suno for copyright infringement

scanx
Reviewed by
Ashish TScanX News Team
Key Highlights

Winamp Group SA subsidiary Jamendo SA filed a federal complaint in Massachusetts against Suno, Inc. regarding alleged unauthorized use of musical content in AI development. The lawsuit claims copyright infringement and seeks damages up to USD 150,000 per work. This action follows a similar complaint against NVIDIA Corporation.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
44347095

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Winamp Group SA subsidiary Jamendo SA has filed a complaint in a U.S. federal court in Massachusetts against Suno, Inc., alleging unauthorized use of musical content in the development of artificial intelligence technologies. Suno, a company specializing in generative AI for music, was recently valued at approximately USD 5.4 billion following its latest funding round. The lawsuit seeks to protect intellectual property rights and those of the artists represented by Jamendo.

Federal Complaint Allegations

The complaint includes claims for copyright infringement, breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and other causes of action under U.S. law. The copyright claims are brought pursuant to the U.S. Copyright Act and seek remedies including monetary damages and injunctive relief. Under the Act, statutory damages may be awarded in amounts up to USD 30,000 per infringed work, and up to USD 150,000 per infringed work in cases of willful infringement.

Claim Type Legal Basis Potential Remedy
Copyright Infringement U.S. Copyright Act Monetary damages, injunctive relief
Breach of Contract U.S. Law Monetary damages
Unjust Enrichment U.S. Law Monetary damages

This proceeding is separate from a recent action brought against NVIDIA Corporation, though both cases raise similar issues regarding the alleged unauthorized use of Jamendo-related content in AI development.

Protecting Artists' Rights

Jamendo stated that the issues raised by these proceedings extend beyond its commercial interests to broader questions about the use of copyrighted works in training generative AI systems. The company aims to protect its own rights, the rights of represented artists, and the licensing frameworks that ensure fair compensation for creators.

"The filing of this complaint marks another important step in Jamendo's efforts to protect the rights of artists in an environment where artificial intelligence is transforming the music industry," said Alexandre Saboundjian, Chief Executive Officer of Winamp Group. "We believe that innovation and respect for intellectual property must go hand in hand to ensure a sustainable ecosystem for creators, rights holders and the companies developing tomorrow's technologies."

Winamp Group owns the Winamp platform, copyright management company Bridger, and music licensing company Jamendo. The company is scheduled to publish its H1 2026 revenue on July 31, 2026.

How might this lawsuit influence the licensing strategies of other generative AI music companies?

Could the outcome of this case set a legal precedent regarding the 'fair use' doctrine for training AI models?

What impact will the litigation have on Suno's ability to secure future funding at its current valuation?

like20
dislike

Winamp Group sues NVIDIA in US over copyright claims

scanx
Reviewed by
Jubin VScanX News Team
Key Highlights

Winamp Group SA's subsidiary Jamendo SA filed a US federal lawsuit against NVIDIA Corporation on June 22, 2026, alleging copyright infringement and unauthorized use of content in AI technologies. Separately, the Ghent Enterprise Court confirmed its jurisdiction on June 11, 2026, over a EUR 16 million commercial claim against NVIDIA Technologies Belgium involving over 55,000 works. The company aims to protect licensing frameworks and artist compensation in the age of generative AI.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
43742143

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Winamp Group SA announced that its subsidiary Jamendo SA has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States against NVIDIA Corporation, alleging unauthorized use of Jamendo-related content in the development and operation of artificial intelligence technologies. The complaint, filed on June 22, 2026, includes claims for copyright infringement, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment. The actions seek to protect the intellectual property rights of the company and the artists it represents, addressing broader questions regarding the use of copyrighted works in generative AI systems.

US Lawsuit and Copyright Claims

The complaint filed in the U.S. Federal Court pursues remedies under the U.S. Copyright Act, including damages and injunctive relief. The document specifies that statutory damages may reach up to USD 30,000 per infringed work, and up to USD 150,000 per infringed work in cases of willful infringement. These claims arise from the alleged exploitation of musical content and related data without proper authorization or compensation.

Belgian Proceedings and Jurisdiction

Simultaneously, the Ghent Enterprise Court confirmed its jurisdiction on June 11, 2026, in the proceedings initiated by Jamendo against NVIDIA Technologies Belgium. This case concerns a commercial claim of approximately EUR 16 million, involving more than 55,000 works. The court rejected procedural objections raised by NVIDIA Technologies Belgium and established a timetable for the continuation of the proceedings.

Key Dates in Belgian Proceedings

Event Date
Court confirms jurisdiction June 11, 2026
Exchange of written submissions End of 2026 – Beginning of 2027
Oral pleadings scheduled June 24, 2027

Management Commentary

Alexandre Saboundjian, Chief Executive Officer of Winamp Group, stated that the actions reflect the company's commitment to protecting the rights of Jamendo and the artists who entrust it with the commercialization of their works. He emphasized the necessity of ensuring creators and rights holders are properly recognized, compensated, and protected as artificial intelligence transforms the music industry.

How will the outcome of this lawsuit influence the licensing strategies of other AI companies regarding copyrighted training data?

What impact could the statutory damages sought in the U.S. case have on NVIDIA's financial projections and AI development costs?

Will this legal action prompt legislative changes to clarify the scope of fair use in training generative AI models?

like17
dislike

More News on Winamp Group SA