Vikram Aroma discloses AGM voting results; all resolutions pass
- All three AGM resolutions passed with majority promoter support
- Promoters abstained from voting on 487,854 shares for director-related items
- Only 14 public shareholders participated via video conferencing
- Single public shareholder voted against CFO reappointment and remuneration hike

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Vikram Aroma Limited disclosed the detailed voting results for its fifth Annual General Meeting held on September 29, 2026. All three ordinary resolutions proposed at the meeting were passed with overwhelming support from the promoter group, while public shareholder participation remained minimal.
The meeting, conducted via video conferencing, was chaired by Ankur Dhirajlal Patel, Chairman and Managing Director. The company confirmed compliance with the Companies Act, 2013 and SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. A. Shah & Associates served as the scrutinizer for the e-voting process.
Voting outcomes by resolution
The scrutinizer's report details the consolidated voting results for the three key items of business. Promoter and promoter group members voted in favor of all resolutions, while a single public shareholder cast votes against the reappointment of the CFO and the remuneration increase.
| Resolution | Description | Votes in Favour | Votes Against | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adoption of FY26 financial statements | 1,995,876 | 33 | Passed |
| 2 | Reappointment of Mahendrabhai Patel (DIN: 09728711) | 1,471,211 | 33 | Passed |
| 3 | Increase in remuneration for Mahendrabhai Patel | 1,471,211 | 33 | Passed |
For Resolution 1, promoters polled 1,984,112 votes in favor, representing 95.95% of their holding. Public non-institutional shareholders polled 11,764 votes in favor against 33 votes against. No votes were recorded from institutional public shareholders.
Shareholder attendance and participation
Voting data reveals a significant concentration of decision-making power within the promoter group. Out of 8,139 shareholders on the record date, only 32 individuals participated through video conferencing. This included 18 promoters and 14 public shareholders. No shareholders attended in person or through proxy.
| Category | Shares Held | Votes Polled | % of Holding Voted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Promoters & Promoter Group | 2,067,807 | 1,984,112 (Res 1) | 95.95% |
| Public Non-Institutions | 1,067,978 | 11,797 | 1.10% |
| Public Institutions | 0 | 0 | 0.00% |
What the numbers show
A divergence in voting patterns is evident between the adoption of financial statements and director-related resolutions. While promoters voted 95.95% of their holding for Resolution 1, they abstained or did not vote on 487,854 shares for Resolutions 2 and 3, likely due to conflict of interest restrictions under Schedule V of the Companies Act, 2013 regarding remuneration and reappointment. This reduced the total valid votes polled for these items to 1,471,211 compared to 1,995,876 for the financials. Despite this reduction in valid votes, the resolutions passed comfortably due to the lack of significant opposition from the public float, which constituted only 1.10% of its holding in the vote.
Historical Stock Returns for Vikram Aroma
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.27% | -11.32% | +65.09% | +120.50% | +41.21% | -4.13% |
How might the near-total absence of institutional investor participation in the AGM influence Vikram Aroma's future capital raising efforts or credit ratings?
What specific operational or strategic changes are expected following the reappointment of Mahendrabhai Patel and the approved remuneration increase?
Could the minimal public shareholder engagement signal broader liquidity concerns or reduced retail interest in Vikram Aroma's stock?

































