Vadilal Dairy gets interim relief in trademark dispute
Vadilal Dairy International Ltd secured interim relief from the Bombay High Court in a trademark dispute, permitting continued use of the Vadilal brand during arbitration. The dispute centers on the interpretation of a 1993 family settlement and related agreements. The court's interim order allows the company to operate normally pending the final arbitral decision.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Vadilal Dairy International Ltd has received interim protection from the Bombay High Court, allowing it to continue its business operations under the Vadilal brand while a trademark dispute is resolved through arbitration. The judgment, pronounced in Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 18386 of 2026, provides interim directions governing the conduct of the parties during the arbitral proceedings.
The dispute arises from the interpretation and implementation of a family settlement and interconnected agreements executed in 1993. These agreements include the Memorandum of Agreement, Brand Agreement, Registered User Agreement, and the Irrevocable Power of Attorney, which govern the respective rights of the parties concerning the Vadilal trademarks and business. The litigation was initiated by Vadilal Industries (USA) Inc. and Vadilal Industries Private Limited.
During a board meeting, Managing Director Shailesh Gandhi informed the board that under the 1993 Family Settlement, the Bombay Group relinquished its partnership and ownership rights in the Ahmedabad Group. In consideration, Mr. Gandhi became the independent owner of the Bombay Group by relinquishing his shareholding in the Ahmedabad Group. He stated that all family agreements executed pursuant to the settlement are irrevocable and non-terminable.
The interim order enables Vadilal Dairy International Ltd to maintain its existing business operations under the Vadilal brand, subject to compliance with the conditions and directions specified in the court's judgment. The Hon'ble Court clarified that its observations are prima facie in nature and that the rights and contentions of all parties remain open for determination in the arbitral proceedings.
The company stated that it continues to operate its business in the ordinary course and will take further legal steps as advised. The disclosure was made to BSE Limited under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
How might the outcome of the arbitration impact the valuation and brand equity of Vadilal Dairy International Ltd?
What are the potential operational risks if the court's interim protection is revoked or modified during the proceedings?
Could this dispute lead to a re-evaluation of the 1993 Family Settlement agreements and their enforceability?























