Usha Martin discloses voluntary Crisil ESG rating of 54

scanx
Reviewed by
Ashish TScanX News Team
Key Highlights
  • Usha Martin received a voluntary ESG rating of 54 from Crisil
  • The Core ESG rating stands at 58 for FY25-26 data
  • The assessment was conducted independently without company engagement
  • Disclosure made under SEBI Listing Regulations Regulation 30
powered bylight_fuzz_icon
48881228

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Usha Martin disclosed a voluntary ESG rating of Crisil ESG 54 and a Core ESG rating of Crisil Core ESG 58. The ratings were assigned by Crisil ESG Ratings & Analytics Ltd on August 21, 2026.

The ratings provider, a SEBI-registered Category-1 agency, issued the scores based on public domain information for financial year 2025-26. The company confirmed it did not engage the agency for the assessment, which was conducted independently.

Rating Details

Metric Value
ESG Rating Crisil ESG 54
Core ESG Rating Crisil Core ESG 58
Rating Agency Crisil ESG Ratings & Analytics Ltd
Data Period FY25-26
Disclosure Date August 21, 2026

The disclosure was made pursuant to Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The company notified the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd, BSE Limited, and Societe de la Bourse de Luxembourg.

Independent Assessment

Manish Agarwal, Company Secretary & Compliance Officer, signed the disclosure. He noted that the ratings were intimated via email at 6:27 pm IST on the date of assignment. The company emphasized that the process was independent, with no engagement or payment involved in securing the ratings.

Historical Stock Returns for Usha Martin

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
-2.90%-3.23%-5.33%+19.61%+32.19%+630.90%

How might Usha Martin's independent Crisil ESG ratings influence its cost of capital and attractiveness to international institutional investors focused on sustainable finance?

What specific operational or strategic initiatives is Usha Martin likely to prioritize to improve its Core ESG score from 58 in the upcoming fiscal year?

Will this voluntary disclosure trigger a trend among other Indian paper and packaging manufacturers to seek independent ESG assessments under SEBI Regulation 30?

Usha Martin AGM voting results show institutional dissent on board appointments

scanx
Reviewed by
Suketu GScanX News Team
Key Highlights
  • Usha Martin declared a final dividend of ₹3.75 per share for FY26 at its 40th AGM
  • All 12 resolutions passed, including adoption of financials and auditor appointments
  • Institutional investors opposed MD remuneration and two independent director reappointments
  • Promoter group voted unanimously in favor of all resolutions
  • 968 members voted, with 944 using remote e-voting
powered bylight_fuzz_icon
48782814

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Usha Martin declared a final dividend of ₹3.75 per equity share for FY26 during its 40th Annual General Meeting held on August 20, 2026. The company also approved the appointment of new directors and statutory auditors.

The meeting, conducted via Video Conferencing / Other Audio-Visual Means, commenced at 11:30 am and concluded at 1:05 pm. Chairman Vijay Singh Bapna presided over the proceedings, highlighting the company's strongest performance since the sale of its steel business. He emphasized growth in international markets and progress under the "One Usha Martin" initiative.

Voting Results Overview

The scrutinizer’s report confirmed that all 12 resolutions were passed with the requisite majority. A total of 968 members cast their votes, comprising 944 through remote e-voting and 24 electronically during the meeting. Out of 109,652 shareholders on the record date, 9 promoter group members and 109 public shareholders attended via video conference. No shareholders were present in person or via proxy.

Key Resolutions Approved

Members approved several ordinary and special resolutions concerning financial statements, auditor appointments, and director remuneration.

Resolution Type Description
Ordinary Adoption of standalone and consolidated financial statements for FY26
Ordinary Declaration of dividend of ₹3.75 per equity share
Ordinary Reappointment of Mr. Chirantan Chatterjee as director
Ordinary Appointment of M/s MSKA & Associates LLP as Statutory Auditors for five years
Ordinary Ratification of remuneration for Cost Auditors (M/s Mani & Co.)
Special Approval of remuneration for Managing Director Mr. Rajeev Jhawar

Board Appointments

The AGM approved the reappointment of Independent Directors Mr. Venkatachalam Ramakrishna Iyer and Mr. Sethurathnam Ravi. Additionally, Ms. Shreya Jhawar, Mr. Dimitri Bracco Gartner, and Mr. Sabyasachi Majumder were appointed as Non-Executive (Non-Independent) Directors.

All ten directors attended the meeting. Representatives of the Statutory Auditors and Secretarial Auditors were also present via video conference. Mr. Raj Kumar Banthia served as the Scrutinizer for the e-voting process.

Institutional Dissent on Key Resolutions

While promoter group votes were unanimous across all resolutions, significant dissent emerged from the Public-Institutions category regarding specific board appointments and remuneration packages.

Resolution Promoter Support Public-Institutions Support Total Support
Financial Statements Adoption 100.00% 99.92% 99.97%
Dividend Declaration (₹3.75) 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
Reappointment of Chirantan Chatterjee 100.00% 93.76% 97.56%
Statutory Auditor Appointment 100.00% 99.95% 99.98%
MD Remuneration (Rajeev Jhawar) 100.00% 77.09% 91.02%
Reappointment of V.R. Iyer (Ind. Dir.) 100.00% 72.45% 89.20%
Reappointment of S. Ravi (Ind. Dir.) 100.00% 92.92% 97.22%
Appointment of Shreya Jhawar 100.00% 88.53% 95.50%

The resolution to approve the remuneration of Managing Director Mr. Rajeev Jhawar saw 22.91% opposition from institutional investors, though it passed with overall support of 91.02%. Similarly, the reappointment of Independent Director Mr. Venkatachalam Ramakrishna Iyer faced 27.55% opposition from institutions, resulting in an overall approval rate of 89.20%.

Shareholding Discrepancy Note

The company noted that the total number of paid-up equity shares is inflated by 230 shares due to an erroneous electronic transfer to the Investor Education & Protection Fund (IEPF) in September 2020. The company is engaging with the IEPF Authority, MCA, CDSL, and its RTA for rectification. Necessary documents have been submitted, and action is pending.

Historical Stock Returns for Usha Martin

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
-2.90%-3.23%-5.33%+19.61%+32.19%+630.90%

How might the significant institutional dissent regarding MD remuneration and independent director appointments impact Usha Martin's corporate governance reputation and future investor relations?

What specific strategic initiatives under the 'One Usha Martin' framework are expected to drive the reported growth in international markets for FY27?

Will the ongoing rectification of the 230-share discrepancy with the IEPF Authority and regulatory bodies have any material impact on the company's shareholding pattern or compliance standing?

More News on Usha Martin

1 Year Returns:+32.19%