Uno Minda files BRSR for FY26, details ESG metrics

1 min read     Updated on 03 Jul 2026, 01:25 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Riya DScanX News Team
AI Summary

Uno Minda filed its Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report for FY26, disclosing ESG metrics such as GHG emissions, water consumption, and waste management. The report includes reasonable assurance from BDO India Services Private Limited and details value chain performance, including emissions and sourcing from MSMEs.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
44529472

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Uno Minda Limited has filed its Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report (BRSR) for the financial year ended March 31, 2026. The report outlines the company's performance on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) parameters, including reasonable assurance on core indicators provided by BDO India Services Private Limited. The disclosures cover the company's Indian operations and include detailed data on greenhouse gas emissions, water consumption, and waste management.

Environmental Performance

The company reported total Scope 1 emissions of 74,542.34 metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent and Scope 2 emissions of 1,19,080.07 metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent for FY 2025-26. The combined emission intensity stood at 1.32 metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent per million rupees of turnover. Water withdrawal totalled 13,57,561.47 kilolitres, with consumption at 13,43,841.42 kilolitres. The company follows a Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) mechanism at several locations to manage wastewater effectively.

Waste Management and Energy

Uno Minda adopted a 6R strategy—Refuse, Rethink, Reduce, Reuse, Repair, and Recycle—for waste management. The total waste generated was 3,209.03 metric tonnes, of which 2,777.57 metric tonnes were recovered through recycling or reuse. Hazardous waste accounted for 1,126.58 metric tonnes. The company is not a designated consumer under the PAT Scheme but continues to monitor energy intensity.

Social and Governance Metrics

The company reported zero fatalities and zero lost time injuries for workers during the year. It spent 1.59% of total revenue on employee well-being measures. The median gross remuneration for employees was ₹10.98 Lakhs, while for workers it was ₹3.23 Lakhs. Gross wages paid to females constituted 31.48% of total wages in the value chain. There were no complaints filed under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013.

Value Chain Disclosures

Under the BRSR Core framework, the company disclosed value chain metrics for FY 2025-26. Value chain partners reported Scope 1 emissions of 27,621.08 tCO2e and Scope 2 emissions of 46,026.19 tCO2e. The water intensity for value chain partners was 2.32 KL per million INR of turnover. Input material directly sourced from MSMEs constituted 36.00% of total procurement.

Historical Stock Returns for UNO Minda

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
+0.45%-0.92%+3.33%-14.77%+2.50%+252.04%

How will Uno Minda plan to reduce its combined emission intensity of 1.32 tCO2e per million rupees of turnover in the coming years?

What specific targets has the company set for increasing the percentage of input materials sourced from MSMEs beyond the current 36%?

Will the company seek designated consumer status under the PAT Scheme to formalize its energy intensity monitoring and reduction efforts?

Uno Minda appeal not considered by Customs authority

1 min read     Updated on 26 Jun 2026, 02:35 AM
scanx
Reviewed by
Anirudha BScanX News Team
AI Summary

Uno Minda received an order from the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-II), Chennai, stating that its appeal against a duty demand of ₹42,97,510 was not considered. The original demand, arising from alleged HSN misclassification, included interest, a penalty of ₹42,97,510, and a redemption fine of ₹10,00,000. Uno Minda intends to contest the latest order and stated there is no material impact on its financial or operational activities.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
43938186

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Uno Minda has received an order from the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-II), Chennai, stating that its appeal against a duty demand was not considered. The company, which disputes the demand of ₹42,97,510, intends to contest the order and does not anticipate any material impact on its financial or operational activities. The order was received on June 24, 2026, at 19:00 PM IST.

The dispute relates to an earlier order from the Office of Commissioner of Customs, Chennai-11, Import, alleging misclassification of HSN on imported goods. The original demand included a differential duty of ₹42,97,510, which was deposited and appropriated, interest under Section 28AA of the Customs Act, 1962, a penalty of ₹42,97,510, and a redemption fine of ₹10,00,000.

Uno Minda had filed an appeal against this initial order. However, the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-II) has now communicated that the said appeal has not been considered. The company disclosed this development under Regulation 30 read with Schedule III of the SEBI (Listing Obligations & Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.

The table below outlines the key details of the order and the associated demands:

Particulars Details
Authority The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-II), 60-Rajaji Salai, Customs House Chennai
Action Taken The appeal filed by the company was not considered by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-II)
Date of Receipt June 24, 2026, around 19:00 PM (IST)
Original Duty Demand ₹42,97,510
Penalty ₹42,97,510
Redemption Fine ₹10,00,000

In its filing, Uno Minda clarified that it intends to contest against the order received from the appellate authority. The company further asserted that it does not anticipate any material impact on its financial, operational, or other activities as a result of this development.

Historical Stock Returns for UNO Minda

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
+0.45%-0.92%+3.33%-14.77%+2.50%+252.04%

What specific legal recourse will Uno Minda pursue following the rejection of their appeal by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-II)?

Could this customs dispute lead to increased scrutiny or similar classification challenges for Uno Minda's other imported components?

How might the prolonged legal proceedings affect the company's working capital management despite the claim of no material financial impact?

More News on UNO Minda

Must Read Next

Earnings

Corporate Actions

Stocks

1 Year Returns:+2.50%