Tirth Plastic seeks shareholder nod for ₹13.5 crore warrant issue
Tirth Plastic Limited is conducting a postal ballot for shareholders to approve a ₹13,50,00,000 preferential issue of fully convertible warrants at ₹30 each. The funds will support the acquisition of M/s Krishna Plastic Traders’ manufacturing unit. Additionally, shareholders will vote on appointing Ms. Nidhi Bharatbhai Gandhi as an independent director.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Tirth Plastic Limited shareholders are voting on a special resolution to approve a ₹13,50,00,000 preferential issue of fully convertible warrants and the appointment of an independent director. The proposal, approved by the Board on July 4, 2026, aims to fund strategic acquisitions, specifically M/s Krishna Plastic Traders’ manufacturing unit, while strengthening the company’s capital base. This financing move is critical for supporting inorganic growth and meeting working capital needs.
The voting process is governed by Section 110 of the Companies Act, 2013, and Regulations 29, 30, and 44 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. E-voting and postal ballot facilities are available from 9:00 a.m. on July 25, 2026, until 5:00 p.m. on August 23, 2026. The cut-off date for determining voting rights is July 21, 2026. M/s A. Shah & Associates has been appointed as the scrutinizer to ensure a fair process, with results expected by August 25, 2026.
Warrant Structure and Pricing
The warrants carry a face value of ₹10 each and are convertible into one equity share of the same face value. Pricing was determined based on Regulation 164(1) of the SEBI ICDR Regulations, with a relevant date of July 24, 2026. The floor price was calculated at ₹29.13, leading the Board to fix the issue price at ₹30. Valuation reports were obtained from M/s Shweta Jain & Co LLP.
Investors must pay 25% of the issue price upfront as the Warrant Subscription Price. The remaining 75% is payable upon exercise of the conversion option within 18 months from allotment. If not exercised, the entitlement expires, and amounts paid are forfeited. The resulting equity shares will rank pari-passu with existing shares regarding dividends and voting rights.
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Total Issue Size | ₹13,50,00,000 |
| Number of Warrants | 45,00,000 |
| Issue Price per Warrant | ₹30 |
| Upfront Payment (25%) | ₹7.50 per warrant |
| Conversion Payment (75%) | ₹22.50 per warrant |
| Conversion Period | 18 months from allotment |
Allottees and Shareholding Impact
The warrants are being allotted to 42 non-promoter entities, including individuals, HUFs, and companies such as Sellwin Traders Limited and Mideast Healthcare Pvt Ltd. Thakor Rohit Popatji is the largest proposed allottee, receiving 880,000 warrants. Post-conversion, promoter holding is expected to dilute from 23.53% to 11.70%, while non-promoter holding will increase from 76.47% to 88.30%. The company states there will be no change in management or control consequent to the issue.
Board Appointment
In a separate resolution, shareholders will vote to appoint Ms. Nidhi Bharatbhai Gandhi as a Non-Executive Independent Director for a five-year term effective from February 5, 2026. She was initially appointed as an Additional Director in February 2026. Ms. Gandhi brings experience in customer relationship management and operations coordination across telecom and logistics sectors. Her appointment is subject to shareholder approval under Section 149 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Historical Stock Returns for Tirth Plastic
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +3.37% | +8.48% | -7.38% | +0.90% | +101.34% | +8,609.68% |
How will the acquisition of M/s Krishna Plastic Traders’ manufacturing unit impact Tirth Plastic’s production capacity and market share in the near term?
What is the likely impact on the stock price if the 45,00,000 warrants are exercised at the ₹30 conversion price versus the current market valuation?
Given the significant dilution of promoter holding from 23.53% to 11.70%, how might this shift in ownership structure influence corporate governance and strategic decision-making?































