Swagtam Trading posts ₹4.34 lakh profit on other income in Q1FY27
Swagtam Trading & Services Ltd posted a net profit of ₹4.34 lakh in Q1FY27, driven entirely by other income as sales revenue remained nil. The Board approved the results on August 11, 2026, with statutory auditors G.K. Kedia & Co. issuing a limited review report.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Swagtam Trading & Services reported a net profit of ₹4.34 lakh for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 (Q1FY27), a significant increase from ₹0.15 lakh in the corresponding period of FY26. The profitability was driven entirely by other income, as the company recorded zero sales revenue for the third consecutive quarter. Total revenue stood at ₹8.89 lakh, compared to ₹6.59 lakh in Q1FY26, reflecting a modest rise in non-operating receipts while core trading activities remain dormant.
The Board of Directors approved the unaudited standalone financial results during a meeting held on August 11, 2026. The results were reviewed by M/s. G.K. Kedia & Co., the statutory auditors of the company, who issued a limited review report pursuant to Regulation 30 and 33 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The review was conducted in accordance with Standard on Review Engagement (SRE) 2410. Company Secretary Chetan Malik confirmed the submission of newspaper publications of the results to BSE Limited on August 12, 2026, complying with regulatory disclosure norms.
Financial Performance
The company’s financial structure for Q1FY27 highlights a complete absence of core trading activity. Sales revenue remained at ₹0.00 lakh, consistent with the preceding quarter (Q4FY26) and the corresponding quarter of FY26. Consequently, total revenue was composed solely of other income/receipts, which totaled ₹8.89 lakh. This represents an increase from ₹6.59 lakh in Q1FY26 and a decrease from ₹12.59 lakh in Q4FY26.
Expenses were tightly controlled at ₹4.54 lakh, down significantly from ₹136.57 lakh in Q4FY26, where purchase of stock-in-trade accounted for the bulk of costs. In Q1FY27, purchase of stock-in-trade was nil. Employee benefits expense remained stable at ₹1.50 lakh, while other expenses decreased to ₹3.04 lakh from ₹4.91 lakh in the prior year’s corresponding quarter. Depreciation and amortization expense was recorded at nil.
| Particulars | Q1FY27 (₹ Lakh) | Q4FY26 (₹ Lakh) | Q1FY26 (₹ Lakh) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales Revenue | 0.00 | 132.28 | 0.00 |
| Other Income | 8.89 | 12.59 | 6.59 |
| Total Revenue | 8.89 | 144.87 | 6.59 |
| Total Expenses | 4.54 | 136.57 | 6.44 |
| Profit Before Tax | 4.34 | 8.30 | 0.15 |
| Tax Expense | 0.00 | 3.58 | 0.00 |
| Net Profit | 4.34 | 4.72 | 0.15 |
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between revenue composition and profit growth indicates that Swagtam Trading & Services is currently operating without active trading volumes. The net profit margin expanded dramatically due to the fixed nature of certain overheads like employee benefits, which did not scale with the absence of sales. While Q4FY26 saw high sales of ₹132.28 lakh, the subsequent quarters have shown no operational turnover. Investors should note that the current profitability is sustained by other income rather than core business operations, suggesting a pause or shift in the company’s primary trading activities.
Earnings per share (basic and diluted) stood at ₹0.36 per equity share of ₹10 face value, up from ₹0.01 in Q1FY26. The company’s paid-up capital remains at 11,90,500 equity shares. No investor complaints were received or pending during the quarter.
Historical Stock Returns for Swagtam Trading & Services
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +2.37% | 0.0% | +17.15% | +19.65% | -8.13% | 0.0% |
What strategic initiatives is Swagtam Trading & Services planning to restart core trading activities after three consecutive quarters of zero sales revenue?
How sustainable is the company's current profitability model if it remains dependent on non-operating 'other income' rather than core business operations?
Are there any pending regulatory or operational hurdles that have contributed to the complete dormancy of the company's trading segment since Q4FY26?





























