Supreme Court Dismisses OMDC's Special Leave Petitions Against Jai Balaji Industries Ltd
The Supreme Court of India dismissed two Special Leave Petitions filed by Orissa Minerals Development Company against Jai Balaji Industries Limited via a common order dated 08.05.2026, finding no grounds to interfere with the Calcutta High Court's judgment dated 09.12.2025 in FMA 939/2012 and FMA 941/2012. The bench of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran condoned the delay but dismissed the petitions outright. The company received the order on 13.05.2026 and made the requisite regulatory disclosure on 14.05.2026.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
The Supreme Court of India has dismissed two Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) filed by The Orissa Minerals Development Company Limited against Jai Balaji Industries Limited (JBIL), via a common order dated 08.05.2026. The company disclosed this development to the stock exchanges on 14.05.2026, in compliance with Regulation 30 requirements. The Supreme Court order was received by the company on 13.05.2026.
Background of the Petitions
The two SLPs were filed by Orissa Minerals Development Company before the Supreme Court of India, challenging a judgment and order dated 09.12.2025 passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta. The High Court proceedings pertained to FMA 939/2012 and FMA 941/2012. The key details of the petitions are summarised below:
| Parameter: | Details |
|---|---|
| SLP Diary No. 1: | 73842/2025 |
| SLP Diary No. 2: | 73816/2025 |
| Impugned HC Judgment Date: | 09.12.2025 |
| High Court Cases: | FMA 939/2012 and FMA 941/2012 |
| Supreme Court Order Date: | 08.05.2026 |
| Order Received By OMDC: | 13.05.2026 |
| Disclosure Date: | 14.05.2026 |
Supreme Court's Order
The matter was heard on 08.05.2026 by a bench comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran. After hearing counsel from both sides, the Court condoned the delay in refiling and curing defects (IA No. 132836/2026) but found no good ground or reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court at Calcutta. The special leave petitions were accordingly dismissed, and all pending applications were disposed of.
Legal Representation
Both parties were represented by legal counsel during the hearing. The key representatives are noted below:
For the Petitioner (OMDC):
- Mr. K.M. Nataraj, Additional Solicitor General
- Mr. Shovan Mishra, Advocate on Record
- Ms. Bipasa Tripathy, Advocate
- Mr. Shlok Luthra, Advocate
For the Respondent (Jai Balaji Industries Limited):
- Mr. S. Niranjan Reddy, Senior Advocate
- Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, Advocate on Record
- Ms. Pushpanjali Singh, Advocate
- Mr. Vipul Kumar, Advocate
- Ms. Sana Jain, Advocate
- Ms. Gursimrat Kaur, Advocate
- Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate
Regulatory Disclosure
The disclosure was made by Pintu Kumar Biswal, Company Secretary of Orissa Minerals Development Company, and was addressed to the compliance departments of the National Stock Exchange of India Limited, Bombay Stock Exchange Limited, and The Calcutta Stock Exchange Limited. A copy of the Supreme Court order dated 08.05.2026 was enclosed with the communication for reference and record.
Historical Stock Returns for Orissa Minerals Development Comp
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -3.30% | -4.15% | +10.36% | -20.17% | -25.94% | +60.72% |
How will the Supreme Court's dismissal of OMDC's petitions impact the mineral supply agreements and operational dynamics between OMDC and Jai Balaji Industries going forward?
Could this legal outcome influence OMDC's mining lease renewals or resource allocation strategies, potentially affecting its long-term revenue and stock performance?
Will Jai Balaji Industries leverage this favorable ruling to renegotiate terms or expand its raw material sourcing arrangements with OMDC or other mineral suppliers?






























