Steelman telecom Limited has filed its quarterly compliance certificate with the Bombay Stock Exchange, fulfilling regulatory requirements under SEBI's depository regulations. The submission, dated 07.04.2026, pertains to the quarter ended 31st March 2026 and demonstrates the company's adherence to mandatory reporting obligations.

Regulatory Compliance Details

The certificate was submitted pursuant to Regulation 74(5) of SEBI (Depositories and Participants) Regulations, 2018. Company Secretary and Compliance Officer Aparupa Das signed the submission on behalf of Steelman Telecom Limited, ensuring proper authorization and compliance with corporate governance requirements.

Certificate Status and Applicability

Bigshare Services Pvt. Ltd., serving as the company's registrar and transfer agent, confirmed that Regulation 74(5) is not applicable to Steelman Telecom Limited. This determination stems from the fact that the entire shareholding of the company remains in demat form, with no physical share certificates in circulation.

The registrar's certificate, dated 06/04/2026, specifically states that no requests for rematerialisation were received from any company members during the quarter ended 31st March 2026. This indicates that all shareholders continue to maintain their holdings in electronic format through depository participants.

Stakeholder Notifications

The compliance submission was distributed to key regulatory and depository entities to ensure comprehensive record-keeping. The filing was sent to multiple parties including the Bombay Stock Exchange, Central Depository Services (India) Limited, and National Securities Depository Limited.

Corporate Information

Steelman Telecom Limited operates from its registered office at Rishi Tower Premises, New Town, Kolkata, West Bengal. The company, formerly known as Steelman Telecom Private Limited, maintains its compliance obligations through proper documentation and timely submissions to regulatory authorities.

This quarterly filing represents standard regulatory practice for listed companies, ensuring transparency and adherence to SEBI's framework governing depository operations and participant responsibilities.

Steelman Telecom Limited has officially disclosed comprehensive voting results for its Extraordinary General Meeting held on March 19, 2026, in compliance with Regulation 44(3) of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The company submitted detailed scrutinizer reports to BSE Limited, providing complete transparency on shareholder voting patterns and resolution outcomes.

Official Disclosure and Regulatory Compliance

The company's disclosure, dated March 20, 2026, was submitted to BSE Limited under scrip code 543622. Company Secretary Aparupa Das (Membership No: 42450) formally communicated the voting results along with the scrutinizer report dated March 19, 2026, ensuring full compliance with regulatory requirements.

Scrutinizer Appointment and E-Voting Process

Mr. Saurabh Basu from S Basu & Associates, a qualified Company Secretary (ACS: 18686), was appointed as scrutinizer through a board resolution dated February 18, 2026. The scrutinizer issued the final report on March 19, 2026, validating the entire e-voting process and meeting proceedings.

Resolution 1: Authorized Capital Increase - Approved

The first resolution regarding the increase in authorized share capital from Rs 11.00 crore to Rs 12.50 crore received overwhelming approval. Out of 96,76,200 total shares, 76,74,600 shares participated in voting, representing 79.31% participation.

Resolution 2: Material Related Party Transactions - Rejected

The second resolution for approval of material related party transactions faced significant rejection from shareholders. Only 7,09,200 shares participated in voting (7.33% of total), with 6,75,600 votes against the resolution.

Shareholder Category-wise Participation

The voting results revealed distinct patterns across different shareholder categories. Promoter and promoter group held 69,65,400 shares and voted entirely in favor of the capital increase resolution. However, for the RPT resolution, promoter votes were declared invalid due to their interested party status.

The comprehensive disclosure demonstrates the company's commitment to transparency and regulatory compliance, providing shareholders with detailed insights into the decision-making process and voting outcomes for both resolutions considered during the EGM.