SPL Industries Limited Clarifies Shareholding Discrepancy of 216 Shares for Promoter Group Entity
SPL Industries Limited clarified a 216-share discrepancy between quarterly shareholding patterns and CDSL records for promoter group entity Sunil Kumar & Sons. The company reported 1,91,700 shares in quarterly filings, while CDSL showed additional 216 shares with dummy PAN. Verification with CDSL and Kfin Technologies confirmed total holding of 1,91,916 shares across two demat accounts. The company will include the additional shares under promoter group category in future filings to ensure record consistency.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
SPL Industries Limited has submitted a clarification to the National Stock Exchange and BSE regarding a shareholding discrepancy involving promoter group entity Sunil Kumar & Sons. The discrepancy relates to a difference of 216 shares between the company's quarterly shareholding pattern submissions and records maintained by the designated depository CDSL.
Shareholding Discrepancy Details
The company identified inconsistencies between its reported shareholding data and depository records for the promoter group entity. In quarterly shareholding patterns submitted to stock exchanges, SPL Industries reported 1,91,700 equity shares held by Sunil Kumar and Sons under the promoter and promoter group category. However, CDSL records reflected an additional entry of 216 equity shares in the same entity's name, but with a dummy PAN, creating the discrepancy.
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Reported Shares (Quarterly Pattern) | 1,91,700 shares |
| Additional CDSL Entry | 216 shares |
| Issue Identified | Dummy PAN for additional shares |
| Total Verified Holding | 1,91,916 shares |
Investigation and Resolution Process
Following detailed scrutiny with CDSL, the company discovered that the PAN against the 216 shares had not been updated, leading to the discrepancy. Further verification was conducted with the registrar and share transfer agent Kfin Technologies Limited. Through PAN-based demat account mapping at the designated depository level, the investigation confirmed the actual shareholding structure.
The verification process revealed that the total holding of 1,91,916 shares is distributed across two separate demat accounts:
- 1,91,700 shares held in the name of Sunil Kumar and Sons
- 216 shares held in another demat account under the name Sunil Jindal
Historical Context and Classification
The company noted that the 216 shares in question have been held in the respective demat account for a considerable period and were previously classified under the public category. These shares form part of the overall shareholding of the promoter group, with no recent acquisition or transaction activity involving these specific shares.
Corrective Measures
To ensure consistency between the designated depository CDSL records and the registrar Kfin Technologies Limited records, SPL Industries has decided to include the 216 shares under the promoter and promoter group category in subsequent shareholding pattern filings. This adjustment will align the company's reported shareholding data with the actual depository records and eliminate future discrepancies.
The clarification was signed by Managing Director Mukesh Kumar Aggarwal and submitted to both the National Stock Exchange and BSE for their records. This proactive disclosure demonstrates the company's commitment to maintaining accurate and transparent shareholding records in compliance with regulatory requirements.
Historical Stock Returns for SPL Industries
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.77% | +20.80% | +34.43% | -7.67% | -1.72% | +6.23% |
Will this shareholding reclassification trigger any regulatory compliance requirements or minimum public shareholding adjustments for SPL Industries?
How might this promoter group shareholding increase affect the company's corporate governance policies and minority shareholder voting dynamics?
Could this discrepancy discovery prompt regulatory authorities to mandate more frequent reconciliation processes between depositories and company records across the market?

































