Sparkle Gold Rock appoints Dhadda and Associates as new statutory auditor

2 min read     Updated on 11 Aug 2026, 03:13 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Jubin VScanX News Team
AI Summary

Sparkle Gold Rock Limited has replaced its statutory auditor, appointing M/s Dhadda and Associates following the resignation of M/s G.R. Gupta & Company due to fee-related commercial viability issues. This governance update aligns with the company's Q1FY27 results, which showed a 206% rise in net profit to ₹24.92 lakh driven by a surge in revenue to ₹1,277.90 lakh.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
47984885

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Sparkle Gold Rock Limited (formerly Sree Jayalakshmi Autospin Limited) has appointed M/s Dhadda and Associates as its new statutory auditors, effective August 11, 2026. The Board of Directors approved the appointment to fill the casual vacancy created by the resignation of its previous auditor, M/s G.R. Gupta & Company, who cited commercial non-viability at the previously paid fee as the reason for stepping down. This governance update coincides with the company’s Q1FY27 results, which reported a net profit of ₹24.92 lakh.

The Board accepted the resignation of M/s G.R. Gupta & Company (FRN: 006201C) during a meeting held on August 11, 2026. The outgoing firm confirmed it had issued its limited review report for the quarter ended June 30, 2026, prior to resigning and stated there were no other material reasons for the departure. The appointment of M/s Dhadda and Associates (FRN: 013807S) is subject to shareholder approval at the ensuing General Meeting, in compliance with Section 139 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Auditor Transition Details

M/s G.R. Gupta & Company was originally appointed for a five-year term starting from FY25 (Financial Year 2024-25) at the Annual General Meeting held on September 30, 2024. Their resignation was communicated via an intention letter dated July 27, 2026, with immediate effect from August 11, 2026. The firm declared that it was not commercially viable to continue services at the fee previously agreed upon.

M/s Dhadda and Associates, a peer-reviewed Chartered Accountancy firm established in 2012 with a pan-India presence, was recommended by the Audit Committee. The new auditors provide services including Audit & Assurance, Valuation, Forensic Audit, Financial Advisory, Ind AS, ESG/BRSR, and Impact Assessment. Harsha Ramnani, a partner at Dhadda and Associates, provided consent to act as statutory auditor, certifying eligibility under the Companies Act, 2013.

Particulars Outgoing Auditor Incoming Auditor
Firm Name M/s G.R. Gupta & Company M/s Dhadda and Associates
FRN 006201C 013807S
Effective Date Resigned Aug 11, 2026 Appointed Aug 11, 2026
Reason Commercial non-viability Casual vacancy
Approval Status Accepted by Board Subject to Shareholder Approval

Regulatory Compliance

The disclosure was made pursuant to Regulation 30 read with Schedule III of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The company also referenced SEBI Master Circular No. Ho/49/14/14(7)2025-CFDPOD2/I/3762/2026, last updated on January 30, 2026, regarding the change in statutory auditors. The Audit Committee and Board members expressed appreciation for the contribution of M/s G.R. Gupta & Company during their tenure.

What the Numbers Show

The change in auditors occurs alongside a significant financial turnaround for Sparkle Gold Rock. In Q1FY27, the company reported a net profit of ₹24.92 lakh, a 206% year-on-year increase from ₹8.15 lakh in Q1FY26. Revenue from operations surged to ₹1,277.90 lakh from ₹185.28 lakh in the same period last year. While the auditor change is procedural, the timing highlights the company’s focus on stabilizing governance structures as it scales operations and reduces leverage, with borrowings falling to ₹489.07 lakh from ₹1,604.61 lakh as of March 31, 2026.

Historical Stock Returns for Sparkle Gold Rock

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
-2.71%+7.43%+12.52%-1.35%-29.06%+3,662.89%

Will the appointment of M/s Dhadda and Associates require a fee restructuring compared to the previous auditor, and how might this impact Sparkle Gold Rock's administrative expenses in FY27?

Given the 206% surge in net profit and significant debt reduction, will the new auditors conduct a forensic review of the previous fiscal year's financials to ensure compliance with Ind AS standards?

How might the change in statutory auditors influence investor confidence and stock liquidity, particularly given the outgoing firm's citation of commercial non-viability as the reason for resignation?

Sparkle Gold Rock faces audit qualifications on related party deals

2 min read     Updated on 13 Jun 2026, 11:19 AM
scanx
Reviewed by
Ashish TScanX News Team
AI Summary

Sparkle Gold Rock Limited's financial results for the year ended March 31, 2026, were accompanied by several audit qualifications. Key issues include unverified related party transactions worth crores, non-compliance with the Companies Act regarding approvals, and unascertained liabilities under MSME and GST laws. Additionally, the company failed to provide for Expected Credit Losses on trade receivables exceeding ₹5459.92 lakhs.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
42875359

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Sparkle Gold Rock Limited reported its financial results for the quarter and year ended March 31, 2026, disclosing multiple audit qualifications that highlight compliance and governance risks. The auditors flagged significant related party transactions amounting to ₹1971.40 lakhs in sales and ₹3308.16 lakhs in purchases with Sparkle Gold Mine Private Limited. The report indicates that while the company asserts these transactions were conducted at arm's length prices, the auditors were unable to verify this claim due to fluctuating bullion prices and industry practices, leaving the exact financial impact unascertained.

Governance and Compliance Gaps

The audit report draws attention to non-compliance with Section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013. While the company obtained shareholder approval for purchase transactions up to ₹2104.53 lakhs, other related party transactions lacked mandatory prior approvals. The auditors noted that the legal validity and financial consequences of these unauthorized transactions cannot be ascertained. Management stated that transactions exceeding the approved limit will be ratified by the required authority and affirmed that there is no financial impact on the financial statements.

MSME and Tax Liabilities

Auditors identified lapses regarding the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) Act. The company has not implemented a comprehensive MSME mapping system, making it impossible to ascertain the full financial impact of unrecorded penal interest liabilities and consequential tax disallowances under Section 23 of the MSMED Act and Section 43B(h) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Furthermore, the company availed Input Tax Credit (ITC) on trade payables outstanding for more than 180 days. While a liability of ₹46.22 lakh towards ITC reversal has been recorded, the interest on this liability has not been provided for, affecting the profit and loss and shareholder's funds.

Credit Loss Provisions

The company has not calculated or recognized the provision for Expected Credit Loss (ECL) on outstanding trade receivables of ₹5459.92 lakhs as required by Ind AS 109. Management has not established a provision matrix for lifetime expected credit losses. However, the company claims to have received confirmations from parties confirming that the balances are fully recoverable and will be settled in the normal course of business, hence no provision is considered necessary.

Summary of Audit Qualifications

Sr. No. Issue Impact Management's View
1 Related party transactions (Sales: ₹1971.40 lakhs, Purchases: ₹3308.16 lakhs) Unable to determine if at Arm Length Price No impact; transactions at market prices and arm's length basis
2 Non-compliance with Section 188 of Companies Act, 2013 Legal validity and financial consequence cannot be ascertained Excess transactions to be ratified; no financial impact
3 Unrecorded penal interest under MSMED Act Impact on profit/loss and liabilities cannot be ascertained Impact not quantified
4 GST ITC reversal on payables > 180 days (Liability: ₹46.22 lakh) Interest not provided; financial statements affected ITC reversed; consulting experts on interest liability
5 Absence of ECL provision on receivables (₹5459.92 lakhs) Quantification of adjustments necessary cannot be determined Balances considered recoverable; no provision required

Historical Stock Returns for Sparkle Gold Rock

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
-2.71%+7.43%+12.52%-1.35%-29.06%+3,662.89%

What are the potential regulatory penalties or legal repercussions Sparkle Gold Rock Limited might face for non-compliance with Section 188 of the Companies Act?

How will the company's inability to verify arm's length pricing for related party transactions affect investor confidence and share valuation?

What steps is management taking to implement the required MSME mapping system and quantify the potential unrecorded penal interest liabilities?

More News on Sparkle Gold Rock

1 Year Returns:-29.06%