Paramount Gold Nevada sees NPV of $402M for Sleeper Gold Project
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. announced an Initial Assessment for its Sleeper Gold Project, projecting a 17-year mine life with an after-tax NPV of $402 million and a 1.4-year payback under base case metal prices. The study highlights strong economics driven by existing infrastructure and waste rock processing, with an upside case NPV of $867 million at higher gold prices.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. announced the results of an Initial Assessment for its 100%-owned Sleeper Gold Project, outlining a potential restart with strong projected returns. The study, prepared in accordance with S-K 1300, evaluates the redevelopment of the past-producing mine located in Humboldt County, Nevada, utilizing existing waste rock dumps and conventional open-pit mining methods alongside a 30,000 tonne per day crush-agglomerate-heap-leach processing facility with Merrill-Crowe recovery.
The Project demonstrates robust economics under base case assumptions of $3,600 per ounce gold and $48 per ounce silver. The Assessment indicates an after-tax net present value (NPV) at an 8% discount rate of $402 million, an after-tax internal rate of return (IRR) of 44%, and a payback period of approximately 1.4 years. A sensitivity analysis assuming higher metal prices of $4,700 per ounce gold and $80 per ounce silver projects an after-tax NPV of $867 million, an IRR of 66%, and a payback period of 1.2 years.
Project Economics and Production
Over a 17-year mine life, the Assessment projects average annual gold production of approximately 65,000 ounces and total payable gold production of approximately 1.1 million ounces. The use of existing mineralized surface material and infrastructure contributes to the Project's strong economics by reducing upfront capital requirements. Approximately 47 million tonnes of mineralized waste dump material containing approximately 420,000 recoverable ounces of gold are included in the mine plan, providing a lower-cost source of early production. The economic analysis considers only oxide and mixed mineralized material amenable to heap leaching and does not include sulfide mineralization.
Rachel Goldman, Chief Executive Officer of Paramount, stated that the first five years of the Project are expected to produce approximately 348,000 ounces of gold and 1.33 million ounces of silver. This initial phase is anticipated to generate after-tax cash flow of approximately $514 million in the Base Case and $826 million in the Upside Case, supported by a low strip ratio of 0.74:1.
Key Financial Metrics
The following table summarizes the key metrics from the Assessment, comparing the Base Case and Upside Case scenarios.
| Metric | Base Case ($3,600/oz Gold) | Upside Case ($4,700/oz Gold) |
|---|---|---|
| Project Economics | ||
| After-tax NPV (8%) | $402M | $867M |
| After-tax IRR | 44% | 66% |
| Payback | 1.4 years | 1.2 years |
| Production Profile | ||
| Average Annual Gold Production | 65 koz | 65 koz |
| Average Annual Silver Production | 205 koz | 205 koz |
| Total Payable Gold | 1.101 Moz | 1.101 Moz |
| Total Payable Silver | 3.376 Moz | 3.376 Moz |
| Mine Life | 17 years | 17 years |
| Capital and Cost Structure (Base Case) | ||
| Initial Capital | $201M | $201M |
| Sustaining Capital | $343M | $343M |
| Closure Capital | $52M | $52M |
| Cash Costs | $2,048/oz | $1,987/oz |
| All-in sustaining costs | $2,407/oz | $2,346/oz |
Resource Estimate and Next Steps
The updated Mineral Resource estimate reports 1.99 million ounces of gold in Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources and an additional 2.30 million ounces of gold in Inferred Mineral Resources. This represents an increase of approximately 5% in Measured and Indicated Resources and 90% in Inferred Resources compared to the 2023 estimate.
The Assessment recommends an $8.7 million advancement program to improve resource confidence, complete environmental baseline studies, and advance permitting activities. The Company plans to initiate permitting for infill drilling targeting surface material, with the updated S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 8-K.
How does Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. plan to secure the $201 million in initial capital required for the project restart?
What are the expected timelines for completing the environmental baseline studies and obtaining the necessary permits?
Could the inclusion of sulfide mineralization in future studies significantly alter the project's economics or mine life?
























