Shri Keshav Cements FY26 Results: Revenue hits record ₹161 crore
Revenue hit a record high of ₹161.31 crore in FY26, up 32.8% YoY. Dispatch volumes surged 36%, outperforming regional cement peers. Net loss widened to ₹6.53 crore from ₹6.17 crore in FY25. Statutory auditors issued a qualified opinion citing pending GST investigation. Board seeks approval for executive remuneration exceeding regulatory limits.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Shri Keshav Cements & Infra Limited reported a record annual revenue of ₹161.31 crore for FY26, marking a 32.8% increase from the previous year’s ₹121.45 crore. The cement manufacturer achieved its highest-ever sales figures despite industry-wide overcapacity in the southern region.
The company attributed this growth to a 36% year-on-year increase in dispatches, outperforming regional peers. Management highlighted that its renewable power generation cost advantage allowed it to withstand pricing pressures and expand market share while competitors faced constrained demand.
Financial Performance
Despite the robust top-line growth, Shri Keshav Cements reported a net loss of ₹6.53 crore for the year, widening from the ₹6.17 crore loss recorded in FY25. The profit before tax stood at a loss of ₹104.62 lakh, an improvement from the ₹170.16 lakh loss in the prior year.
| Metric | FY26 | FY25 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from Operations | ₹161.31 crore | ₹121.45 crore | +32.8% |
| Total Income | ₹164.63 crore | ₹124.60 crore | +32.1% |
| Total Expenses | ₹165.68 crore | ₹126.30 crore | +31.2% |
| Net Loss | ₹6.53 crore | ₹6.17 crore | Wider |
Total expenses rose to ₹165.68 crore from ₹126.30 crore in FY25. Finance costs increased to ₹21.56 crore from ₹18.10 crore, reflecting higher borrowing obligations associated with capacity expansion projects.
What the Numbers Show
While operational revenue grew significantly, the bottom line was heavily impacted by non-operational tax charges. The company recorded a deferred tax charge of ₹5.48 crore, compared to ₹4.43 crore in FY25. This tax expense, driven by incremental liabilities on property, plant, and equipment, effectively erased the pre-tax improvement and contributed to the wider net loss. Other income remained relatively stable at ₹3.32 crore, indicating that the revenue growth was purely operational rather than aided by significant one-off gains.
Balance Sheet and Governance Signals
The company’s debt-equity ratio rose to 2.64 times from 2.43 times in the previous year, signaling increased leverage as it funds its expansion. Cash and cash equivalents stood at a lean ₹29.22 lakh at the end of March 2026.
The statutory auditors issued a qualified opinion on the financial statements. The qualification relates to an ongoing Goods and Services Tax (GST) investigation by the Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (DGGI). The company had paid ₹8.60 crore towards GST and interest under protest in 2020-21 and 2021-22. As no final order has been passed by the reporting date, the auditors could not comment on the ultimate impact of this amount held in other current assets.
Additionally, the Board of Directors sought shareholder approval to ratify managerial remuneration for three executive directors—Venkatesh Katwa, Vilas Katwa, and Deepak Katwa—at levels exceeding the limits prescribed under Section 197 of the Companies Act, 2013, and SEBI regulations. This request is necessitated by the company’s loss-making status during the financial year.
Historical Stock Returns for Shri Keshav Cement & Infra
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +3.90% | -6.85% | -18.92% | -42.06% | -36.81% | +66.81% |
How will the ongoing GST investigation and the associated ₹8.60 crore liability impact Shri Keshav Cements' cash flow and balance sheet once a final order is passed?
Given the rising debt-equity ratio of 2.64x and lean cash reserves, what specific strategies is management employing to service the increased finance costs of ₹21.56 crore?
Can the company sustain its market share gains against regional peers in the long term, or will industry-wide overcapacity eventually erode the pricing advantage provided by renewable energy costs?


































