Shimmick Q2FY26 Results: Adjusted EBITDA turns positive to $4 million
- Consolidated revenue fell 16% YoY to $107 million, but adjusted EBITDA turned positive to $4 million
- Gross margin expanded to 12% from 6% as non-core backlog dropped below 3% of total
- Record backlog reached $991 million, with a 1.4 book-to-burn ratio for the fourth consecutive quarter
- Net loss narrowed 44% to $5 million despite a $1 million rise in SG&A expenses
- Full-year 2026 guidance reaffirmed at $525-$575 million revenue and $15-$30 million adjusted EBITDA

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Shimmick Corporation (NASDAQ: SHIM) reported second-quarter 2026 consolidated revenue of $107 million, with adjusted EBITDA turning positive to $4 million from a loss of $234,000 in the same period last year.
The infrastructure contractor achieved a gross margin of 12%, up from 6% in Q2 2025, driven by the strategic wind-down of lower-margin non-core projects. The company ended the quarter with a record backlog of $991 million, supported by $138 million in new awards during the quarter and an additional $221 million secured post-close.
Financial Performance
Shimmick’s project revenue for Q2 2026 was $96 million, down from $113 million in Q2 2025, as older projects reached completion. However, non-core project revenue declined more sharply, falling to $11 million from $16 million, reflecting the termination of the Chick Lock replacement project and continued progress in exiting legacy work.
| Metric | Q2 2026 | Q2 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consolidated Revenue | $107 million | $128 million | -16% |
| Gross Margin | $12 million (12%) | $8 million (6%) | +50 bps |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $4 million | -$234,000 | Turnaround |
| Net Loss | $5 million | $9 million | Narrowed |
Gross margin from core Shimmick projects decreased by $4 million to $11 million, primarily due to an $11 million decline in margins from winding-down projects. This was partially offset by a $7 million increase in margins from newer ramping projects. Non-core project gross margin improved significantly to $2 million from a negative $7 million, as cost overruns recorded in the prior year did not recur.
SG&A expenses rose to $16 million from $15 million, driven by one-time legal costs and equity issuance expenses. Despite these costs, the net loss narrowed by 44% to $5 million.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between revenue decline and margin expansion highlights the impact of portfolio mix changes. While total revenue fell 16% year-over-year, the removal of negative-margin non-core work allowed gross margins to double. With non-core backlog now representing less than 3% of the total, future margin pressure from legacy losses is largely eliminated, setting a higher baseline for profitability as new, higher-margin projects begin execution.
Backlog and Strategic Outlook
The company’s book-to-burn ratio stood at 1.4, marking the fourth consecutive quarter of positive performance. CEO Yaral Yaal noted that less than 10% of the backlog booked over the past 12 months has been converted into revenue, indicating significant visibility for future growth.
Key developments include:
- Establishment of a dedicated Mission Critical business unit to target data centers, advanced manufacturing, and defense sectors.
- A West Virginia data center project transitioning to pre-construction, with work expected to start within 60 days.
- Geographic focus on California, Texas, and Washington, with strong demand in water infrastructure and electrification.
Shimmick reaffirmed its full-year 2026 revenue guidance of $525 million to $575 million and adjusted EBITDA guidance of $15 million to $30 million. The company ended the quarter with $33 million in liquidity, comprising $17 million in unrestricted cash and $16 million in available credit.
How will the newly established Mission Critical business unit impact Shimmick's gross margins as it scales operations in data centers and advanced manufacturing?
Given the current liquidity of $33 million, what is Shimmick's strategy for funding the execution of its $991 million backlog without requiring additional dilutive equity issuances?
What specific risks could threaten the projected $15 million to $30 million adjusted EBITDA guidance if demand in key regions like California, Texas, or Washington softens?




























