Roopshri Resorts AGM passes all resolutions with 56.8% voting turnout
- Roopshri Resorts passed both ordinary resolutions at its 36th AGM with 100% support from votes polled
- Total voting turnout was 56.82% of outstanding shares, with promoters voting 78.41% of their holdings
- Statutory and secretarial auditors reported no adverse qualifications for FY26
- Mrs. Sonakshi Shreyas Shah was re-appointed as director following retirement by rotation

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Roopshri Resorts concluded its 36th Annual General Meeting on September 11, 2026, with shareholders unanimously approving both ordinary resolutions. The company reported a total voting turnout of 56.82% against the outstanding share capital as on the record date.
The meeting was conducted through Video Conferencing and Other Audio-Visual Means (VC/OAVM) in compliance with Ministry of Corporate Affairs and SEBI circulars. It commenced at 3:30 pm and concluded at 3:53 pm, inclusive of a 15-minute e-voting window for attendees.
Meeting Proceedings
Eleven members, including one director, attended the virtual gathering. Shreyas Shah, Chairperson and Managing Director, presided over the session. Unnati Bhanushali, Company Secretary and Compliance Officer, welcomed participants and introduced the Board members and Key Managerial Personnel.
Representatives from the statutory auditors, V.N. Purohit & Company, and secretarial auditors, JNG & Co. LLP, also joined the meeting to address queries regarding the audit process.
Audit and Compliance
Ms. Bhanushali informed members that the reports of both the Statutory Auditors and the Secretarial Auditor for FY26 contained no qualifications, observations, or comments that could adversely affect the company’s functioning.
Remote e-voting was available from September 7, 2026, at 9:00 am until September 10, 2026, at 5:00 pm. Members attending the AGM were granted an additional 15 minutes post-conclusion to cast votes on all resolutions via the National Securities Depository Limited (NSDL) platform.
Voting Results
The scrutinizer report filed with the BSE confirms that both resolutions were passed with 100% support from the votes polled. No votes were cast against either resolution, and no invalid votes were recorded.
| Resolution Description | Votes Polled | % of Outstanding Shares | Votes In Favour | Votes Against |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adoption of Audited Financial Statements for FY26 | 4,101,980 | 56.82% | 4,101,980 | 0 |
| Re-appointment of Mrs. Sonakshi Shreyas Shah | 4,101,980 | 56.82% | 4,101,980 | 0 |
The promoter group held 4,863,980 shares and voted 3,813,980 shares (78.41% of their holding) in favour of both resolutions. Public non-institutional shareholders held 2,355,040 shares and voted 288,000 shares (12.23% of their holding), also fully in favour. Public institutional shareholders did not participate in the voting process.
Chairman’s Address
Shreyas Shah addressed shareholders regarding the company’s performance during FY25-26. He expressed gratitude to the Board for their guidance and to shareholders and customers for their continued trust in the company’s vision.
As all resolutions had been put to vote through remote e-voting, there was no need for proposing or seconding resolutions during the meeting. No voting by show of hands was conducted.
Members were invited to ask questions, but none volunteered to speak. The meeting concluded with a vote of thanks. The formal scrutinizer report has now been submitted to the exchange.
Historical Stock Returns for Roopshri Resorts
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.99% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
How does the 100% approval rate for the re-appointment of Mrs. Sonakshi Shreyas Shah signal stability in corporate governance, and what strategic initiatives is she expected to lead in FY27?
Given the clean audit reports for FY26, what specific operational or financial milestones did Roopshri Resorts achieve that contributed to this unqualified status?
With public institutional shareholders abstaining from voting, are there indications of broader institutional interest or skepticism regarding the company's growth trajectory in the hospitality sector?





























