Revathi Equipment AGM rejects Semac Construction related party deal
- Shareholders rejected the material related party transaction with Semac Construction Limited at the 7th AGM
- The resolution received only 26.74% assent against 73.26% dissent among voting shares
- Routine resolutions including financial statement adoption and Deepali Dalmia's re-appointment were passed with 98.23% support
- Promoters and related parties holding 18,43,942 shares abstained from voting on the rejected resolution

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Revathi Equipment India Limited shareholders rejected the approval of material related party transactions with Semac Construction Limited during the company's 7th Annual General Meeting held on September 25, 2026. The resolution failed to secure the requisite majority, marking a significant governance outcome for the Coimbatore-based firm.
The meeting was conducted entirely through Video Conferencing (VC) and Other Audio Visual Means (OAVM) in compliance with Ministry of Corporate Affairs circulars. A total of 47 members representing 20,05,389 equity shares attended the virtual session. While routine items such as the adoption of audited standalone and consolidated financial statements for FY26 and the re-appointment of Deepali Dalmia were passed, the special business item concerning Semac Construction drew dissent.
Voting results on resolutions
The scrutinizer's report detailed the voting outcomes for the four agenda items. Items 1 through 3 were passed with overwhelming support, while Item 4 failed due to insufficient votes in favor.
| Resolution | Description | Assent (%) | Dissent (%) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item No. 1 | Adoption of audited standalone and consolidated financial statements for FY26 | 98.23% | 1.77% | Passed |
| Item No. 2 | Re-appointment of Deepali Dalmia as Director | 98.23% | 1.77% | Passed |
| Item No. 3 | Ratification of remuneration for cost auditors | 98.23% | 1.77% | Passed |
| Item No. 4 | Approval of material related party transactions with Semac Construction Limited | 26.74% | 73.26% | Failed |
For Item No. 4, only 15 members voted in favor, casting votes for 16,163 shares, while 6 members voted against, casting votes for 44,286 shares. Notably, two shareholders who are related parties or promoters, holding 18,43,942 equity shares, abstained from voting on this specific resolution.
Board attendance and governance
The following directors participated in the meeting from various locations:
| Director | Designation |
|---|---|
| Abhishek Dalmia | Chairman and Managing Director |
| V. V. Subramanian | Independent Director; Chairman of Audit, Nomination and Remuneration, and Stakeholders Relationship Committees |
| Natarajan S Iyer | Independent Director |
Key Managerial Personnel present included Mahesh Gupta, Chief Financial Officer, and Madhavi Singh, Company Secretary. Directors Deepali Dalmia, P Muthusekkar, and B V Ramanan were unable to attend due to prior commitments.
What the numbers show
The rejection of the related party transaction highlights a divergence between promoter control and minority shareholder sentiment. While promoters and related parties holding over 18 lakh shares abstained from voting on the Semac Construction deal, the remaining eligible voters overwhelmingly opposed it, with dissent accounting for 73.26% of valid votes cast on that item. This contrasts sharply with the near-unanimous approval for routine governance matters, where dissent was limited to 1.77%.
Historical Stock Returns for Revathi Equipment
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.97% | -1.82% | -10.69% | +24.33% | -46.12% | -79.02% |
Will Revathi Equipment India seek to restructure the proposed transactions with Semac Construction Limited or explore alternative partners for future capital expenditure needs?
How might the significant dissent from minority shareholders influence the company's strategy regarding related party disclosures and governance reforms in upcoming quarters?
What are the potential regulatory implications or SEBI inquiries that could arise from the high volume of abstentions by promoter-held shares on material related party transactions?


































