Quadrant Future Tek shareholders adopt FY26 financials at 11th AGM
- All four ordinary resolutions passed at Quadrant Future Tek's 11th AGM
- Voting turnout reached 73.28% with 66 members casting votes
- Public institutions voted 100% against director reappointments
- Financial statements adopted with 99.99% approval

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Quadrant Future Tek Limited held its 11th Annual General Meeting (AGM) on September 25, 2026, where shareholders approved the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026. The meeting was conducted through Video Conferencing and Other Audio Visual Means, complying with regulatory guidelines.
Resolutions Passed
The company’s board proposed several ordinary resolutions, all of which were passed with the requisite majority. Key approvals included the adoption of the annual accounts and the reappointment of directors retiring by rotation.
| Resolution Item | Type | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Adoption of audited financial statements for FY26 | Ordinary | Passed |
| Reappointment of Amit Dhawan (DIN: 03031778) | Ordinary | Passed |
| Reappointment of Aikjot Singh Sandhu (DIN: 06579087) | Ordinary | Passed |
| Ratification of cost auditor remuneration for FY27 | Ordinary | Passed |
Voting Results and Participation
The scrutinizer’s report revealed that 66 members cast their votes through e-voting, representing 29,310,505 shares. This accounted for 73.28% of the total outstanding shares of 40,000,000. The record date for entitlement to vote was September 18, 2026.
While all resolutions were passed, voting patterns varied significantly by shareholder category:
- Adoption of Financial Statements: Passed with 99.99% votes in favor. Only 10 votes were cast against, all from public non-institutional shareholders.
- Director Reappointments: Both Mr. Amit Dhawan and Mr. Aikjot Singh Sandhu were reappointed. However, Public-Institutional shareholders voted 100% against both resolutions. Promoters and public non-institutional shareholders supported the appointments.
- Cost Auditor Remuneration: Ratified with 99.99% support. Public non-institutional shareholders recorded a dissent rate of 6.19% on this item.
The abstention counts for director reappointments were high (3.5 million for Dhawan and 1.5 million for Sandhu), primarily due to the interested directors abstaining from voting on their own re-appointments as per statutory requirements.
Meeting Proceedings and Voting
The AGM commenced at 11:00 am and concluded at 11:51 am. Puneet Khurana, Company Secretary and Compliance Officer, briefed members on the procedural aspects, including the e-voting mechanism. Remote e-voting was open from September 22 to September 24, 2026. Girish Madan & Associates served as the scrutinizer for the voting process.
Satish Kumar Gupta, Chairman of the company, presided over the meeting. He confirmed that the statutory auditors’ reports contained no qualifications or adverse remarks. Mohit Vohra, Managing Director, provided an overview of the company’s business performance during the session.
Next Steps
The final voting results will be submitted to stock exchanges within two working days of the conclusion of the meeting, in accordance with Regulation 44 of the Listing Regulations. These results will also be available on the company’s website and the NSDL portal for stakeholder review.
Historical Stock Returns for Quadrant Future Tek
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +9.41% | +4.99% | +22.40% | +88.31% | +31.07% | +23.31% |
How might the unanimous opposition from institutional shareholders to director reappointments impact Quadrant Future Tek's future corporate governance ratings and institutional investment inflows?
What specific strategic initiatives or capital allocation plans did Managing Director Mohit Vohra outline during the AGM that could influence the company's growth trajectory for FY27?
Given the high abstention rates due to statutory requirements, will Quadrant Future Tek implement any new independent director appointments to balance board composition and address potential governance concerns?


































