Prenetics Global Q2FY26 Results: Revenue up 3.9x, guidance raised
- Prenetics Global Q2 revenue rose 3.9x YoY to $46.5 million
- Full-year revenue guidance raised to $220-230 million range
- Adjusted free cash flow turned positive in July for first time
- Company secured $1 billion growth financing from General Catalyst
- New customer acquisition cost fell 21% in July to $239

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Prenetics Global (NASDAQ: PRE) reported second-quarter revenue of $46.5 million, a 3.9x increase from the prior year period. The consumer health company raised its full-year revenue guidance to $220-230 million.
The firm turned adjusted free cash flow positive in July for the first time, supported by $1 billion in growth financing from General Catalyst. Management projects revenue of $400 million or more by 2027.
Financial Performance
Total revenue reached $46.5 million in Q2, reflecting a 29% quarter-over-quarter growth. The IM8 brand contributed $45 million to this total, operating at a 65% gross margin. This margin represents an improvement of approximately three full points compared to the same period last year.
| Metric | Q2FY26 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $46.5 million | +3.9x YoY |
| Gross Profit | $30.2 million | 65% margin |
| Fixed Operating Costs | $8.8 million | 19% of sales |
| Contribution Profit | $21.4 million | 46% margin |
| Adjusted EBITDA | -$19 million | Loss |
| Net Loss | -$9 million | -$0.52 per share |
Fixed operating costs stood at $8.8 million, or 19% of sales. While this figure was 14% higher than the prior quarter, it was 2.3 times greater than the year-ago period. Contribution profit, defined as gross profit minus operating costs, reached $21.4 million, or 46% of sales. This marks a 16 percentage point improvement in contribution margin versus the prior year.
Marketing and Unit Economics
Acquisition marketing spend totaled $36.2 million, representing 78% of sales. The company acquired 118,000 new customers during the quarter, a 98% increase from the prior quarter. Customer acquisition cost (CAC) remained flat to slightly down at a 1% decrease despite the doubling of spend from Q1.
In July, the company acquired a record 47,373 customers at a CAC of $239, which is roughly 21% lower than the Q2 average. Revenue for July reached $20.9 million, with an annualized running rate of approximately $251 million. Adjusted free cash flow turned positive in July, driven by the General Catalyst facility funding 70% of the acquisition marketing line.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between rising top-line growth and declining fixed cost leverage highlights the company's operational model. Fixed operating expenses fell 21% quarter-over-quarter as a percentage of sales, while the workforce remained stable at around 70 employees. This indicates that the 3.9x revenue growth is being driven by variable marketing spend rather than proportional increases in headcount or fixed overhead, validating the management's claim of an AI-native organizational structure.
Guidance and Balance Sheet
Management raised full-year total revenue guidance to $220-230 million, with IM8 contributing $215-222 million. For Q3, the company guides to $63-64 million in parent company revenue. The full-year adjusted EBITDA loss is expected to narrow significantly in the second half, dropping to a negative $8-12 million loss from a negative $24.6 million loss in the first half.
The balance sheet shows $109.4 million in cash and current financial assets. The company executed a share buyback of $40 million in the first half, reducing Class A shares outstanding to 13.6 million from 15.3 million at the end of calendar year 2025. Fully diluted shares stand at 19.2 million, including warrants.
How sustainable is the 78% marketing spend-to-revenue ratio as Prenetics scales toward its $400 million revenue target by 2027?
What specific operational efficiencies or AI-driven strategies are expected to drive the significant narrowing of the adjusted EBITDA loss in the second half of the year?
Given the heavy reliance on General Catalyst financing for acquisition costs, how might changes in credit markets or investor sentiment impact future growth capital availability?

































