Perfectpac secures YEIDA land allotment for ₹22.74 crore packaging project

scanx
Reviewed by
Shriram SScanX News Team
Key Highlights
  • Perfectpac Limited secured a 16,200 square meter industrial plot from YEIDA for a corrugated box packaging manufacturing unit.
  • The total cost for the leasehold allotment is ₹22.74 crore, with a 90-year tenure.
  • Initial registration money of ₹2.27 crore is due within 30 days, with the balance of ₹20.46 crore payable within 90 days.
  • The transaction is not classified as a related party transaction involving promoters or key managerial personnel.
powered bylight_fuzz_icon
51879197

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Perfectpac Limited has secured an industrial plot allotment from the Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority (YEIDA) to establish a new corrugated box packaging manufacturing facility.

The allotment, dated September 25, 2026, covers a 16,200 square meter plot in Sector 8D of the YEIDA region. The project is structured on a 90-year leasehold basis, providing long-term operational stability for the company's expansion into industrial packaging.

Financial terms and payment schedule

The total amount payable for the plot, including the Premium Lease Charge (PLC), stands at ₹22.74 crore. The payment structure requires an initial registration money of ₹2.27 crore, which is 10% of the total value, due within 30 days of the allotment letter issuance. The remaining balance of ₹20.46 crore must be settled within 90 days from the same date.

Parameter Details
Allottee Perfectpac Limited
Location Sector 8D, YEIDA
Area 16,200 square meter
Project Type Corrugated Box Packaging Manufacturing
Total Cost ₹22.74 crore
Tenure 90 years (leasehold)

Regulatory and compliance details

The company confirmed that this transaction does not constitute a related party transaction. The seller, YEIDA, is not related to the Promoter, Promoter Group, or any Key Managerial Personnel of Perfectpac. This disclosure was made under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.

Strategic implications

The acquisition of a large-format industrial plot signals Perfectpac's intent to scale its manufacturing capabilities. The 90-year tenure mitigates long-term real estate risks, while the phased payment schedule allows the company to manage near-term liquidity pressures associated with capital expenditure.

Historical Stock Returns for Perfectpac

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
+3.02%+22.52%+12.00%+7.64%-13.98%+121.93%

How will Perfectpac fund the remaining ₹20.46 crore balance within the 90-day window without straining its working capital?

What is the projected timeline for commissioning the new facility and achieving full production capacity in Sector 8D?

How does this capacity expansion align with current demand trends in the e-commerce and FMCG packaging sectors?

Perfectpac AGM resolutions pass with 99.99% shareholder vote

scanx
Reviewed by
Ashish TScanX News Team
Key Highlights
  • Perfectpac Limited’s 54th AGM resolutions passed with 99.998% majority
  • Total valid votes polled stood at 50,05,430 out of 66,59,500 shares
  • Promoter group voted 100% in favor across all six agenda items
  • Only 98 dissenting votes recorded from public non-institutional shareholders
powered bylight_fuzz_icon
51094051

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Perfectpac Limited has released the consolidated voting results for its 54th Annual General Meeting (AGM), confirming that all six agenda items were approved with a 99.9980% majority. The meeting, held on September 16, 2026, via video conferencing, saw shareholders endorse the final dividend, audited financials, and key board appointments.

A total of 50,05,430 valid votes were polled out of 66,59,500 outstanding shares as on the record date of September 9, 2026. This represents a 75.16% turnout among the 3,181 shareholders eligible to vote. The promoter group, holding 49,83,430 shares, voted in favor of all resolutions with a 100% participation rate through remote e-voting.

Voting Breakdown

The voting process included both remote e-voting (September 13–15, 2026) and e-voting during the AGM. M/s RSM & Co., represented by partners Shri Ravi Sharma and Ms. Suman Pandey, served as scrutinizers.

Category Shares Held Valid Votes Polled % Turnout Votes in Favor Votes Against
Promoter Group 49,83,430 49,83,430 100.00% 49,83,430 0
Public Institutions 3,930 0 0.00% 0 0
Public Non-Institutions 16,72,140 22,000 1.32% 21,902 98
Total 66,59,500 50,05,430 75.16% 50,05,332 98

The only dissenting votes came from the public non-institutional category, where 98 shares voted against all six resolutions. Public institutions did not participate in the voting process.

Resolutions Passed

Shareholders approved three ordinary and three special resolutions:

  • Adoption of audited financial statements for FY26.
  • Declaration of a final dividend of Re. 1.00 per equity share (50% payout).
  • Reappointment of Shri Raj Gopal Sharma as Director upon retirement by rotation.
  • Reappointment of Shri Sanjay Rajgarhia as Managing Director.
  • Increase in borrowing limits under Section 180(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013.
  • Increase in limits for creating mortgage or charge on assets under Section 180(1)(a).

Board Attendance

The following directors attended the meeting via video conferencing:

Name Designation Location
Sanjay Rajgarhia Chairman and Managing Director Delhi
Raj Gopal Sharma Whole Time Director Noida
Ajay Rajgarhia Non-Executive Director Delhi
Manish Garg Independent Director Delhi
Ravindra Nath Chaturvedi Independent Director Delhi
Aradhana Saluja Independent Director Gurgaon

Key Managerial Personnel Ms. Nidhi (Company Secretary) and Shri Mohinder Nagpal (CFO) were also present. Statutory Auditor Samir Vaid and Secretarial Auditor Ravi Sharma served as invitees.

Historical Stock Returns for Perfectpac

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
+3.02%+22.52%+12.00%+7.64%-13.98%+121.93%

How will the approved increase in borrowing limits under Section 180(1)(c) impact Perfectpac's future capital expenditure or debt-to-equity ratio?

What strategic rationale might drive the company to increase limits for creating mortgages or charges on assets under Section 180(1)(a)?

Given the 50% dividend payout ratio, is this sustainable for Perfectpac given its projected cash flow and growth plans for FY27?

More News on Perfectpac

1 Year Returns:-13.98%