Palm Jewels appoints Madhav Upadhyay as secretarial auditor
- Palm Jewels appoints M/s Madhav Upadhyay and Associates as secretarial auditor
- Appointment covers five financial years from FY27 to FY31
- Replaces M/s Neelam Somani & Associates who resigned on September 4, 2026
- Shareholder approval required at the upcoming annual general meeting

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Palm Jewels Limited’s board appointed M/s Madhav Upadhyay and Associates as its secretarial auditor on September 4, 2026. The firm will serve for five consecutive financial years, subject to shareholder approval.
The appointment replaces M/s Neelam Somani & Associates, which resigned effective September 4, 2026, citing personal reasons. The board made the decision on the recommendation of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee.
Auditor Appointment Details
M/s Madhav Upadhyay and Associates has been appointed for a continuous period of five financial years, covering FY27 to FY31. This tenure is subject to approval by members at the upcoming annual general meeting (AGM). The firm brings experience in statutory compliances under SEBI regulations, FEMA, and Company Law.
Mr. Madhav Jayprakash Upadhyay, proprietor of the firm, was also appointed as the scrutinizer for e-voting at the AGM. E-voting will be active from September 25, 2026, at 9:00 am to September 28, 2026, at 5:00 pm.
Annual Report Approval
The board approved the notice for the AGM, the directors’ report with all annexures, and the annual report for FY26. The meeting concluded at 2:50 pm on September 4, 2026.
Historical Stock Returns for Palm Jewels
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +2.06% | +0.99% | 0.0% | -8.63% | -40.96% | -48.32% |
How might the transition from Neelam Somani & Associates to Madhav Upadhyay and Associates impact Palm Jewels' compliance strategy under SEBI and FEMA regulations?
What specific governance improvements or audit findings might the new secretarial auditor highlight during their five-year tenure?
Could the resignation of the previous auditor due to 'personal reasons' signal any underlying corporate governance issues that shareholders should monitor?
































