Muthoot Microfin Q2FY27 Results: AUM up 22% YoY, cost of funds hits single digits
- AUM rose 22% YoY to ₹15,323 crore in Q2FY27
- Disbursements grew 28% YoY to ₹2,900 crore
- Cost of funds declined to 9.93%, entering single digits
- Collection Efficiency improved 477 bps YoY to 98.11%
- Digital collections surged to 47% of total collections

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Muthoot Microfin reported a 22.0% year-on-year (YoY) increase in Assets Under Management (AUM) to ₹15,323 crore for the quarter ended September 30, 2026. The NBFC also saw its cost of funds decline to 9.93%, marking its entry into single-digit territory for the first time.
Disbursements for Q2FY27 stood at ₹2,900 crore, registering a 28% YoY growth and a 10% quarter-on-quarter (QoQ) increase compared to Q1FY27. The company’s portfolio diversification efforts yielded results, with the mix between Joint Liability Group (JLG) and Non-JLG loans improving to 69:31 from 83:17 as of March 31, 2026.
Asset quality and collection efficiency
The company maintained robust asset quality metrics during the reporting period. Collection Efficiency (CE) improved by 477 basis points (bps) YoY to reach 98.11% in Q2FY27. Furthermore, the X-Bucket CE, excluding advances, stood at 99.9%, indicating sustained collection discipline and resilience within the loan book.
The Small and Micro Enterprise Individual Loan (IL) portfolio grew to ₹4,164 crore, maintaining near-zero delinquency rates. Additionally, Muthoot Microfin disbursed ₹453 crore in gold loans through a referral and co-lending model with its parent company, Muthoot Fincorp Limited, further strengthening its secured lending segment.
Funding profile and liquidity
Muthoot Microfin strengthened its funding position by raising a total of ₹3,213 crore during Q2FY27, bringing the overall borrowing for the half-year to ₹5,946 crore. As of September 30, 2026, the company held a robust liquidity position of ₹1,701 crore and had unavailed sanctioned credit lines amounting to ₹4,328 crore.
| Metric | Q2FY27 | Q1FY27 / Prior Period | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Funds | 9.93% | 10.13% (Q1FY27) | -20 bps |
| Incremental Cost of Funds | 9.69% | 9.80% (Q1FY27) | -11 bps |
| Collection Efficiency | 98.11% | N/A (YoY basis) | +477 bps |
The overall cost of funds declined by 20 bps from 10.13% in the previous quarter. The incremental cost of funds also improved by 11 bps QoQ to 9.69%.
Network expansion and digital adoption
As of September 30, 2026, the company operated 1,675 branches and served 32 lakh active customers. It continued to strengthen its presence in markets including Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, and Assam.
Digital initiatives gained significant traction, with cumulative downloads of the Mahila Mitra app reaching 22 lakh. Digital collections increased to 47% in Q2FY27, up from 25% in Q2FY26 and 40% in Q1FY26, reflecting enhanced customer engagement and adoption of digital payment channels.
What the numbers show
The simultaneous improvement in portfolio diversification and cost efficiency highlights a strategic shift toward higher-margin, lower-risk segments. While JLG loans remain the core, the shift to a 69:31 JLG-to-Non-JLG mix suggests a deliberate move to reduce concentration risk. This is supported by the near-zero delinquency in the Individual Loan portfolio, which now constitutes a significant portion of the book. The drop in cost of funds to single digits, combined with rising digital collections, indicates operational leverage is beginning to materialize as scale increases.
Historical Stock Returns for Muthoot Microfin
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +1.04% | -2.07% | -11.74% | +12.91% | +2.52% | -34.36% |
How will the shift to single-digit cost of funds impact Muthoot Microfin's net interest margins in the upcoming quarters?
What are the specific credit risk implications of increasing the Non-JLG loan mix to 31% of the total portfolio?
How does the 47% digital collection rate compare to industry peers, and what further cost efficiencies can be expected as this metric grows?


































