Medicure presents MEND-PNPO Phase 3 study data at European Epilepsy Congress
- Medicure presents MEND-PNPO Phase 3 design and baseline data at European Epilepsy Congress
- Nine patients enrolled in trial evaluating MC-1 for PNPO deficiency; three completed one-year study
- Baseline P5P levels ranged from 59.8 to 165 ng/mL among participants
- Study aims to enroll approximately 10 patients aged 2 years and older
- Company plans further presentations at North American neurology meetings in late 2026

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Medicure Inc. presented the design, rationale, and baseline data from its MEND-PNPO Phase 3 study at the 16th European Epilepsy Congress in Athens, Greece. The pivotal trial evaluates MC-1, a pharmaceutical-grade oral formulation of pyridoxal 5'-phosphate (P5P), for treating Pyridox(am)ine 5'-Phosphate Oxidase (PNPO) deficiency.
The poster presentation, led by Dr. Phillip Pearl of Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, outlines the study's primary and secondary endpoints, dosing regimens, and patient baseline metrics. Co-investigators from sites across the United States, Australia, and Europe contributed to the analysis.
Study Enrollment and Baseline Metrics
MEND-PNPO is a 52-week, open-label, multi-center, externally controlled study targeting patients aged 2 years and older with genetically confirmed PNPO deficiency. Enrollment commenced in January 2023 and is projected to conclude in 2026. The company aims to enroll approximately 10 patients in total.
As of the presentation, nine patients had been enrolled, with three completing the one-year study duration. Baseline data revealed significant variability in prior treatment regimens and physiological markers among participants.
| Metric | Range |
|---|---|
| Baseline P5P Treatment Regimen | 14 to 58 mg/kg/day |
| Baseline Steady-State P5P Levels | 59.8 to 165 ng/mL |
PNPO deficiency is an ultra-rare inherited neurometabolic disorder caused by mutations in the PNPO gene. This mutation prevents adequate production of P5P, the active form of vitamin B6. The condition typically manifests in newborns and infants as severe, difficult-to-control seizures, potentially leading to developmental impairment, neurological dysfunction, or death if untreated. Lifelong P5P therapy is standard, yet no pharmaceutical-grade P5P product is currently approved.
What the Numbers Show
The wide disparity between baseline treatment regimens (14-58 mg/kg/day) and resulting steady-state P5P levels (59.8-165 ng/mL) highlights the clinical challenge of managing PNPO deficiency without standardized pharmaceutical-grade therapy. This variability underscores the rationale for MC-1, which seeks to provide consistent dosing and absorption compared to current non-pharmaceutical alternatives.
Forward-Looking Developments
Medicure plans to present the MEND-PNPO study at two additional North American conferences later this year. These include the Child Neurology Society Annual Meeting in Montreal, Canada, from October 14-17, 2026, and the American Epilepsy Society Annual Meeting in Denver, Colorado, from December 4-8, 2026.
Albert D. Friesen, President and CEO of Medicure, stated that presenting to the European epilepsy community builds awareness of the need for standardized P5P therapy. He emphasized the company's goal to bring the first approved therapy for PNPO deficiency to patients.
MC-1 is not FDA-approved, and its safety and effectiveness have not been established.
Historical Stock Returns for Poly Medicure
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +1.37% | -2.02% | +3.18% | +32.54% | -12.83% | +78.11% |
How might the observed variability in baseline P5P levels influence the statistical power and endpoint definitions for the MEND-PNPO Phase 3 trial?
What is Medicure's projected timeline for submitting an NDA to the FDA following the completion of enrollment in 2026?
How does the open-label, externally controlled design of the MEND-PNPO study impact the regulatory acceptance of its results compared to a randomized controlled trial?


































