Jeevan Scientific Q1 Results: Net profit rises 88% YoY to ₹188.6 lakh
Jeevan Scientific Technology Ltd turned profitable in Q1FY27, reporting a standalone net profit of ₹188.60 lakh versus a loss of ₹215.99 lakh in Q1FY26. Consolidated profits rose 68.7% YoY to ₹86.97 lakh. Revenue grew over 100% YoY on a standalone basis. The board approved multiple director re-appointments and set the AGM for late September.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Jeevan Scientific Technology reported a significant turnaround in profitability for the first quarter of FY27, with standalone net profit rising to ₹188.60 lakh from a net loss of ₹215.99 lakh in Q1FY26. Consolidated net profit also improved, reaching ₹86.97 lakh, up 68.7% year-on-year from a loss of ₹126.22 lakh.
The Hyderabad-based clinical research services company saw its standalone revenue from operations decline 8.4% quarter-on-quarter to ₹1,693.47 lakh, though it remained 106.1% higher than the ₹821.57 lakh recorded in Q1FY25. Consolidated revenue fell 14.1% QoQ to ₹1,827.75 lakh but surged 81.7% YoY compared to ₹1,005.79 lakh in the prior year period.
Financial Performance
The company’s operational efficiency improved alongside the profit turnaround. Standalone other expenses decreased significantly to ₹676.85 lakh from ₹845.64 lakh in the preceding quarter, contributing to the bottom-line recovery despite a slight dip in top-line sales. Employee benefit expenses remained stable at ₹494.67 lakh, including ₹14.05 lakh towards ESOP expenses.
| Metric | Q1FY27 (Standalone) | Q1FY26 (Standalone) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from Operations | ₹1,693.47 lakh | ₹821.57 lakh | +106.1% |
| Net Profit/Loss | ₹188.60 lakh | ₹(215.99) lakh | Turnaround |
| EPS (Basic) | ₹0.95 | ₹(1.36) | Improvement |
On a consolidated basis, the group benefited from lower inventory changes and controlled employee costs, which stood at ₹44.09 lakh. However, finance costs increased to ₹170.27 lakh from ₹177.08 lakh in the prior year, reflecting ongoing debt servicing obligations. The share of profit from associates remained negligible at a loss of ₹0.69 lakh.
What the Numbers Show
A key divergence exists between the standalone and consolidated results. While the standalone entity posted a robust net profit margin of approximately 11.1%, the consolidated group’s margin was thinner at roughly 4.7%. This spread is primarily driven by the performance of subsidiaries and associates, notably Nayas Laboratories Private Limited, which reported a net loss of ₹100.94 lakh for the quarter according to the auditor’s review report. This indicates that while the core clinical research operations are profitable, subsidiary investments continue to weigh on group-level profitability.
Corporate Actions
During its meeting on August 13, 2026, the Board of Directors approved several key administrative and governance matters:
- Re-appointment of Mrs. Snigdha Mothukuri as Whole Time Director for three years effective November 2, 2026.
- Continuation and re-appointment of Mr. Nageswar Rao Yarllagadda as Whole Time Director beyond age 70, effective June 23, 2027.
- Appointment of Mr. Kolli Srinivas Rao as an additional Independent Director effective immediately.
- Scheduling of the Annual General Meeting for FY26 on September 25, 2026, via video conferencing.
Pavuluri & Co., the statutory auditors, issued a limited review report on the interim financial results, stating that nothing came to their attention to cause them to believe the statements contained material misstatements.
Historical Stock Returns for Jeevan Scientific Technology
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +6.13% | +3.37% | +18.89% | +21.45% | +97.89% | -20.41% |
How does the ₹100.94 lakh loss from subsidiary Nayas Laboratories impact Jeevan Scientific's long-term consolidation strategy and future capital allocation?
Given the 8.4% quarter-on-quarter revenue decline, what specific operational adjustments is management implementing to stabilize top-line growth in Q2FY27?
Will the re-appointment of key Whole Time Directors signal a shift in strategic focus or operational restructuring for the clinical research services segment?


































