Hut 8 shares drop 3.5% after report of $35 billion AI infrastructure deal
- Hut 8 shares fell 3.5% to $75.89 on Tuesday
- Reports cite a $35 billion AI deal between Anthropic and Lambda
- Hut 8 is developing a 350 MW data center in Texas for the project
- Nvidia holds the lease on the facility according to sources
- Previous $19.6 billion lease with Nvidia was disclosed in July

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Hut 8 Corp (NASDAQ: HUT) shares declined 3.5% to $75.89 following reports of a major artificial intelligence infrastructure partnership involving the company.
The stock movement occurred after Reuters reported that Anthropic signed a $35 billion cloud-computing deal with Lambda, a Nvidia-backed provider, for a Texas data center developed by Hut 8.
Deal Structure and Capacity
The agreement covers approximately 350 megawatts of capacity located in Nueces County, Texas. According to sources familiar with the matter, Nvidia holds the lease on the data center, while Hut 8 is developing the facility.
The project aims to bring online additional Nvidia capacity to support growing demand for Anthropic’s Claude AI models. This follows Anthropic’s recent announcement of a $45 billion expenditure to rent AI cloud computing power from Nscale’s West Virginia campus.
| Entity | Role | Key Figure |
|---|---|---|
| Anthropic | Tenant/Client | $35 billion deal value |
| Lambda | Cloud Provider | Backed by Nvidia |
| Hut 8 | Developer | 350 MW capacity |
Historical Context
Hut 8 previously disclosed a 15-year lease with an investment-grade customer in July, carrying a base-term contract value of $19.6 billion. The Financial Times later identified Nvidia as the tenant for Hut 8’s 1-gigawatt Beacon Point campus.
What the Numbers Show
The market’s negative reaction to the $35 billion deal report contrasts with the scale of the transaction relative to Hut 8’s prior $19.6 billion lease. The divergence suggests investor caution regarding execution risk or valuation metrics associated with this specific AI infrastructure model, despite the significant capital commitment involved.
How might the market's negative reaction to the $35 billion deal signal broader investor concerns about execution risks in AI infrastructure development?
What are the implications for Hut 8's valuation if Nvidia retains the lease while Hut 8 handles development, compared to direct tenant relationships?
Could this partnership model influence how other crypto-mining firms pivot toward AI infrastructure, and what competitive advantages might they hold?

































