HP High Court quashes ₹117.94 crore GST notice against Morepen Labs
- HP High Court quashed ₹117.94 crore GST recovery notice against Morepen Laboratories
- Court disposed of writ petition in company's favor on October 12, 2026
- Notice alleged violation of Section 54 CGST Act and Rule 89 CGST Rules
- Company reports no impact on financials or operations from the order

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Morepen Laboratories Limited received a favorable judgment from the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla on October 12, 2026. The court quashed a Show Cause Notice seeking ₹117.94 crore in GST recovery, disposing of the writ petition in the company's favor.
The litigation stemmed from a notice issued by the Office of the Commissioner, Central GST & Central Excise Commissionerate, Shimla. The authority alleged that Morepen had contravened Section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017, read with Rule 89 of the CGST Rules, 2017, by erroneously claiming an excess GST refund under Rule 89(4).
Resolution of Tax Dispute
The dispute originated from an SCN dated December 2, 2025, which sought recovery of ₹117,94,03,452 towards excess GST refund, along with applicable interest and penalty. Morepen had previously disclosed this development to stock exchanges in December 2025 and January 2026, noting that the High Court had granted a stay on the recovery proceedings.
The final order, received by the company on October 14, 2026, at 3:00 pm, effectively nullified the demand. The court's decision concludes the legal challenge initiated by the tax authorities regarding the refund claims.
Financial Impact Assessment
In its disclosure under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, Morepen stated that there is no impact on its financials, operations, or other activities due to this order. The quashing of the notice removes the contingent liability associated with the disputed amount.
| Particulars | Details |
|---|---|
| Authority | Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla |
| Order Date | October 12, 2026 |
| Amount Quashed | ₹117.94 crore |
| Alleged Violation | Section 54 CGST Act / Rule 89 CGST Rules |
| Financial Impact | Nil |
What the Numbers Show
The resolution of this matter highlights the significance of judicial intervention in large-scale indirect tax disputes. The disputed amount of ₹117.94 crore represents a substantial sum relative to typical operating cash flows for mid-cap pharmaceutical firms. By securing a complete quashment rather than a partial settlement or remand, Morepen has avoided both the principal outflow and the compounding interest and penalty costs that would have accrued during the litigation period. The absence of any financial impact statement confirms that no provisions were likely required to be adjusted in recent financial statements, preserving the balance sheet integrity.
Historical Stock Returns for Morepen Laboratories
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +5.00% | -10.86% | +10.84% | +220.58% | +162.17% | +135.90% |
Will the GST department appeal the High Court's quashing order to the Supreme Court, potentially reopening the ₹117.94 crore liability?
How might this favorable precedent influence Morepen's future capital allocation strategies or dividend policies given the removal of significant contingent liabilities?
Does this judgment signal a broader shift in judicial interpretation of Rule 89(4) that could benefit other pharmaceutical companies facing similar refund disputes?


































