Hi-Tech Gears Ltd accepted the resignation of Naveen Jain as its Company Secretary and Compliance Officer effective August 29, 2026.

The company disclosed the departure in a filing with stock exchanges on August 29, 2026. Mr. Jain tendered his resignation citing personal reasons.

Resignation Details

Mr. Jain confirmed that there are no material reasons for his resignation other than those mentioned in his letter. The cessation of his role is effective from the closure of business hours on August 29, 2026.

Regulatory Disclosure

The intimation was issued pursuant to Regulation 30 read with Schedule III of the SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015. The filing also referenced SEBI Master Circular No. HO/49/14/14(7)2025-CFD-POD2/I/3762/2026 dated January 30, 2026.

Vijay Mathur, Whole Time Director and CFO, signed the communication on behalf of the company.

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has extended the interim stay on the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) for The Hi-Tech Gears Ltd . The tribunal, in its order dated August 17, 2026, directed that the interim stay granted vide its earlier order dated September 3, 2024, shall continue.

The NCLAT principal bench in New Delhi listed the appeal for the next hearing on September 25, 2026. The matter was originally scheduled for hearing on August 17, 2026, but could not be taken up due to paucity of time.

Regulatory Context

The order pertains to Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1734 of 2024 and I.A. No. 2735 of 2025. The appellant is Naveen Jain, Company Secretary and shareholder of The Hi-Tech Gears Ltd., while the respondents are Happy Forgings Ltd. and another.

The tribunal bench consisted of Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma (Judicial Member), Arun Baroka (Technical Member), and Indevar Pandey (Technical Member). The interim order was passed in hybrid mode.

What the Numbers Show

The continuation of the interim stay implies that the insolvency proceedings remain suspended until further orders from the NCLAT. This maintains the status quo regarding the company’s corporate actions and operational control during the pendency of the appeal.