Hexagon Nutrition faces ₹1.04 Cr customs duty demand and penalty
- Hexagon Nutrition faces a ₹1.04 crore customs demand from Chennai III commissioner
- Order cites misclassification of CTH codes for DTA unit sales
- Breakdown includes ₹81.7 lakh duty, ₹15 lakh fine, and ₹8 lakh penalty
- Company plans to appeal, citing strong merits and no operational impact
- HNEPL subsidiary was amalgamated with parent in January 2026

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Hexagon Nutrition Limited received a customs duty demand and penalty aggregating to ₹1.04 crore from the Commissioner of Customs, Chennai III. The order, dated August 27, 2026, was issued against Hexagon Nutrition Exports Private Limited (HNEPL), a previously wholly owned subsidiary amalgamated with the parent company in January 2026.
The customs authority alleged misclassification of Combined Nomenclation (CTH) codes for products sold to Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) units. This classification error reportedly led to discrepancies in Basic Customs Duty and Social Welfare Surcharge payments.
Breakdown of Demand
The total financial impact outlined in the order includes specific components for duty, fines, and penalties. The company states that the immediate financial impact is limited to these amounts plus applicable interest.
| Component | Amount |
|---|---|
| Customs Duty | ₹81.7 lakh |
| Fine | ₹15 lakh |
| Penalty | ₹8 lakh |
| Total Demand | ₹1.04 crore |
The order was received on Saturday, August 29, 2026. Hexagon Nutrition initiated an internal review and sought legal counsel advice before making the disclosure on September 1, 2026, pursuant to Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
Legal Response
The company strongly disagrees with the findings of the order. Management believes it has a strong case on merits and is preparing to file an appeal before the relevant appellate authority within statutory timelines. Hexagon Nutrition expects a favorable outcome at the appellate level and asserts there is no material impact on its operational activities.
What the Numbers Show
The customs duty component constitutes approximately 78% of the total ₹1.04 crore demand, indicating that the core dispute revolves around tariff classification rather than punitive measures alone. The relatively smaller fine and penalty portions suggest the authority viewed the misclassification as a procedural contravention rather than willful evasion, though the final determination rests with the appellate authority.
Historical Stock Returns for Hexagon Nutrition
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1.80% | -6.09% | +3.12% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
How might the outcome of this customs appeal influence Hexagon Nutrition's future supply chain compliance strategies and internal audit processes?
Could this dispute signal broader regulatory scrutiny on tariff classifications for other Indian nutraceutical exporters, potentially affecting sector-wide margins?
What is the estimated timeline for the appellate process, and how might prolonged litigation impact investor sentiment and stock volatility in the interim?































