GVK Power AGM resolutions pass with over 99% support amid insolvency
- All four AGM resolutions passed with over 99% support due to promoter backing
- Public non-institutional investors opposed director and auditor re-appointments by ~16%
- Company remains under CIRP with no compliant resolution plan received yet
- Voting results show stark divide between promoter group (100% support) and public dissent

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
GVK Power & Infrastructure Limited held its 32nd Annual General Meeting on September 30, 2026, where all proposed resolutions were passed with overwhelming shareholder support, despite the company being under the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The scrutinizer’s report confirmed that no compliant resolution plan has been received within the approved timeline, leaving the Committee of Creditors (CoC) to evaluate liquidation or a new CIRP round.
The company has been under CIRP since July 12, 2024, following an order by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). Mr. Satish Kumar Gupta was appointed as the Resolution Professional (RP), assuming control from the suspended Board of Directors. During the meeting, it was noted that the first round of CIRP concluded after two received resolution plans were deemed non-compliant with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and related regulations.
Voting Results and Resolutions
Despite the ongoing insolvency proceedings, shareholders voted on several ordinary and special business items. The audited financial statements for FY26 were adopted, and key appointments were confirmed. The scrutinizer, Neha Pamnani, reported that 314 members cast votes across the resolutions. Detailed voting data reveals a stark divergence between promoter and public sentiment. While the Promoter and Promoter Group voted 100% in favour of all four resolutions, public non-institutional shareholders showed significant dissent on governance-related appointments.
| Agenda Item | Type | Votes in Favour (%) | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adoption of Financial Statements | Ordinary | 99.99% | Passed |
| Director Re-appointment (GVK Reddy) | Ordinary | 99.96% | Passed |
| Auditor Re-appointment (T R Chadha & Co LLP) | Ordinary | 99.96% | Passed |
| WTD Re-appointment (P V Prasanna Reddy) | Special | 99.96% | Passed |
The resolution to adopt the standalone and consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2026, received 858,633,266 votes in favour against just 44,807 votes against. However, for the re-appointment of Dr. GVK Reddy as Director, public non-institutional shareholders cast 302,143 votes against, representing 15.51% of their polled votes. Similarly, the auditor re-appointment faced 16.41% opposition from this segment, and the special resolution for Mr. P V Prasanna Reddy’s re-appointment as Whole-time Director saw 16.29% opposition from public non-institutions.
Insolvency Process Status
Following the rejection of the initial plans, the CoC resolved to re-initiate the process using an asset-wise sale approach under Regulation 36A(1A). Invitations for Expression of Interest (IEOI) were issued in June and July 2025. While various PRAs submitted IEIs and subsequent resolution plans, none met the compliance requirements within the deadline set by the CoC. The current status involves due diligence on assets, with a final decision on liquidation versus another CIRP round pending.
Governance and Attendance
The meeting was conducted via video conferencing in compliance with MCA and SEBI circulars. Dr. GVK Reddy (Chairman), Mr. G V Sanjay Reddy (Vice-Chairman), and Mr. P V Prasanna Reddy (Whole-time Director) attended virtually. Mr. T Ravi Prakash, Company Secretary, managed the voting process, which included remote e-voting from September 26 to September 29, 2026, and live voting during the session.
What the Numbers Show
The disclosure highlights a critical juncture in GVK Power’s insolvency journey. The rejection of multiple resolution plans over successive rounds indicates significant challenges in attracting viable bids that meet regulatory standards. With the CoC now weighing liquidation against a third attempt at resolution, the asset valuation and market appetite for the company’s infrastructure assets remain the pivotal factors determining its future structure. Notably, while operational control lies with the RP, the shareholders' unanimous endorsement of statutory compliances like auditor and director appointments suggests a continued adherence to corporate governance norms even amidst legal uncertainty. The voting data further reveals that the high overall approval percentages are driven entirely by the Promoter Group's unified block; public non-institutional investors consistently registered double-digit dissent rates (ranging from 15.51% to 16.41%) on governance matters, signaling potential friction between minority stakeholders and the management structure during the insolvency proceedings.
Historical Stock Returns for GVK Power & Infrastructure
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +1.38% | -4.35% | -5.58% | -20.86% | -34.13% | 0.0% |
How might the CoC's decision between liquidation and a third CIRP round impact the recovery rates for secured creditors given the prior plan rejections?
What specific regulatory or valuation hurdles caused the latest resolution plans to fail compliance, and how will these be addressed in future bids?
Will the significant dissent from public non-institutional shareholders regarding director re-appointments trigger regulatory scrutiny or governance reforms by SEBI?


































