GIPCL Postal Ballot Results: Two Resolutions Passed with Overwhelming Support
Gujarat Industries Power Company Limited announced successful completion of its postal ballot e-voting process with two ordinary resolutions receiving overwhelming shareholder approval. The first resolution for appointing Shri Sanjay S. Bhatt as Director received 99.99% approval, while the second resolution for related party transactions secured 99.93% support from public shareholders.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Gujarat Industries Power Company Limited has successfully concluded its postal ballot e-voting process, announcing the results of two ordinary resolutions that received overwhelming shareholder approval. The company conducted the e-voting process in compliance with Section 108 of the Companies Act, 2013 and Regulation 44(3) of SEBI LODR Regulations 2015.
E-Voting Process Details
The remote e-voting process was conducted through Central Depository Services (India) Limited (CDSL) platform from 25th February 2026 at 9:00 A.M. to 26th March 2026 at 5:00 P.M. CS Shailja Pandya of Shailja Pandya and Associates served as the independent scrutinizer for the process.
| Parameter: | Details |
|---|---|
| Record Date: | 20th February 2026 |
| Total Shareholders: | 92082 |
| Participating Folios: | 306 |
| Resolutions Passed: | 2 |
| Scrutinizer: | CS Shailja Pandya (Membership No. 37665) |
Resolution 1: Director Appointment
The first ordinary resolution for appointing Shri Sanjay S. Bhatt (DIN: 02025125), nominee of Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Limited, as a Director of the Company received exceptional support from shareholders.
| Category: | Votes Polled | Votes in Favor | Votes Against | Approval % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter and Promoter Group: | 62729559 | 62729559 | 0 | 100.00% |
| Public-Institutions: | 18987831 | 18987831 | 0 | 100.00% |
| Public-Non Institutions: | 77434 | 67808 | 9626 | 87.57% |
| Total: | 81794824 | 81785198 | 9626 | 99.99% |
Resolution 2: Related Party Transactions
The second ordinary resolution to approve material transactions with related parties for Financial Year 2026-27 also secured strong shareholder approval, though promoter group votes were excluded from this resolution due to their interest in the matter.
| Category: | Votes Polled | Votes in Favor | Votes Against | Approval % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter and Promoter Group: | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% |
| Public-Institutions: | 16781949 | 16781793 | 156 | 99.99% |
| Public-Non Institutions: | 77434 | 66510 | 10924 | 85.89% |
| Total: | 16859383 | 16848303 | 11080 | 99.93% |
Scrutinizer's Findings
CS Shailja Pandya confirmed that both resolutions were passed with requisite majority. The scrutinizer noted that invalid and abstain votes were not considered for percentage calculations, and interested promoter category votes were excluded from the second resolution's percentage calculation as per regulatory requirements.
| Invalid Votes Details: | Resolution 1 | Resolution 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Promoter and Promoter Group: | 25071358 | 87800917 |
| Public Institutions: | 0 | 2205882 |
| Public - Non Institutions: | 0 | 0 |
Voting Participation Analysis
The voting participation showed strong institutional support across both resolutions. For the first resolution, 52.70% of outstanding shares participated in voting, while the second resolution saw 10.86% participation, primarily from public shareholders as promoter votes were excluded due to their interest in related party transactions.
The company has fulfilled its disclosure obligations under SEBI LODR Regulations 2015 by announcing these results to BSE Limited and National Stock Exchange of India Limited on 27th March 2026.
Historical Stock Returns for Gujarat Industries Power Company
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1.61% | -6.80% | -12.34% | -32.56% | -31.40% | +61.71% |
What strategic initiatives might Gujarat Industries Power Company pursue with the newly appointed director from Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Limited?
How will the approved material related party transactions for FY 2026-27 impact the company's financial performance and operational synergies?
Could the strong institutional investor support signal potential changes in the company's capital allocation or expansion plans?


































