Gujarat HC orders Timken India to pay regular wages in dispute
The Gujarat High Court has upheld a Labour Court order directing Timken India to pay regular wages to former employee Anil Ambalal Modi from January 2005 until superannuation. The court affirmed that the 1995 termination was illegal as it was not preceded by an inquiry and dismissed appeals by both parties. Timken India is assessing the financial impact and intends to file an appeal against the order.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
The Gujarat High Court has upheld a Labour Court order directing Timken India to pay regular wages to a former employee from January 2005 until the date of superannuation. The order pertains to a labour dispute involving Antifriction Bearings Corporation Limited, which amalgamated with Timken India, and former employee Anil Ambalal Modi. The company is currently assessing the financial impact of the judgment and has indicated it is likely to file an appeal against the order passed on June 17, 2026.
The dispute originated from the termination of Mr. Modi's employment on November 22, 1995. Following a failed conciliation, the matter was referred to the Labour Court, which in 2005 ruled the termination illegal and awarded back wages at 65% with a direction for reinstatement. The management appealed this decision, arguing that the workman had instigated other employees to undertake a go-slow, leading to a production drop. However, the court found no evidence to substantiate the allegation that Mr. Modi, who was an Account Clerk, had instigated the workers.
The High Court affirmed the findings of the Labour Court and the Single Judge, noting that the termination was not preceded by an inquiry. The bench observed that the management had previously settled similar matters with other employees dismissed during the same period. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeals filed by both the management and the workman.
The court directed the management to pay the same salary that Account Clerks were entitled to from January 2005 until the workman attained superannuation. This payment must account for all increments and enhancements provided to regular Account Clerks during that period. The company is entitled to deduct wages already paid under Section 17(B) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and wages paid from September 2016, when the workman was reinstated. The due amount shall be computed and made over to the workman within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.
| Detail | Description |
|---|---|
| Authority | High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad |
| Date of Order | June 17, 2026 |
| Date of Receipt | June 22, 2026 |
| Dispute | Termination of Anil Ambalal Modi in 1995 |
| Court Direction | Pay regular wages from Jan 2005 to superannuation |
| Financial Impact | Under assessment |
Timken India has informed the exchanges that the computation of the financial liability is in progress and will take some time. The company stated that it intends to challenge the present order.
Historical Stock Returns for Timken
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.18% | +3.47% | +0.27% | +23.69% | +15.77% | +143.97% |
What is the estimated financial liability Timken India faces, and how might this impact their upcoming quarterly earnings?
What is the likelihood of success for Timken India's intended appeal, given the High Court's affirmation of previous rulings?
Could this judgment set a precedent for similar pending labour disputes involving the amalgamation of Antifriction Bearings Corporation Limited?

































