Goldman Sachs private credit fund sees redemptions fall to 2% in Q3

scanx
Reviewed by
Naman SScanX News Team
Key Highlights
  • GS Credit fund redemptions fell to 2% in Q3 from 3.2% in Q2
  • Fund attracted $400 million in gross subscriptions during the quarter
  • Apollo, Blackstone, and Morgan Stanley capped redemptions at 5% amid higher demand
  • Class I shares returned approximately 9.4% since inception through August 2026
powered bylight_fuzz_icon
52344191

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS) reported that redemption requests for its $18.2 billion GS Credit fund fell to 2% of shares in the third-quarter tender offer, down from 3.2% in the prior quarter. This decline suggests easing outflow pressure for the vehicle, which has maintained repurchase requests below the typical 5% cap since its launch.

The fund attracted approximately $400 million in gross subscriptions during the period. Goldman noted that a significant portion of the investor base originates from its private wealth business, where clients typically possess longer investment horizons and accept lower liquidity compared to institutional allocators. The firm did not provide additional detail on what drove the third-quarter inflows or the decline in redemption requests.

Peers face elevated withdrawal demands

While Goldman saw moderation, other major non-traded private credit funds continued to manage significant redemption pressure by enforcing caps.

Fund Asset Size Redemption Request Cap Applied Prior Period Request
GS Credit (Goldman Sachs) $18.2 billion 2% None disclosed 3.2%
Apollo Debt Solutions BDC $26 billion 14.7% 5% 16.8%
Cliffwater LLC Flagship Not specified ~16% 5% Not specified
North Haven Private Income (Morgan Stanley) Not specified 11.4% 5% Not specified
Blackstone Private Credit Fund (BCRED) $77.2 billion ~10% 5% Not specified

Apollo Global Management (NYSE: APO) capped redemptions at 5% after investors sought to redeem 14.7% of shares in the Apollo Debt Solutions BDC, a decrease from the 16.8% requested in the prior period. This marks the third consecutive quarter of elevated redemptions for the fund. Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) faced similar constraints at its North Haven Private Income Fund, where investors attempted to withdraw 11.4% of shares, more than double the 5% buyback limit.

Blackstone (NYSE: BX) also capped withdrawals at 5% for its $77.2 billion Blackstone Private Credit Fund (BCRED) after investors tendered roughly 10% of shares. Jon Gray, President and COO of Blackstone, stated earlier this month that investor confidence in private credit would recover despite broader concerns about valuations and underwriting. "Over time, investor confidence will be rebuilt, and the inflows will return," Gray said. "There's a lot of noise, a lot of critics; the town criers are proclaiming a global crisis - and then nothing happens."

Market sentiment shifts on software credit

Competing funds have experienced heavier redemption activity through 2026 as investors assessed underwriting discipline and the outlook for software borrowers amid AI-related shifts. However, GS Credit indicated a change in tone regarding this sector.

"The concerns around software-related credit quality that dominated headlines earlier in 2026 have begun to moderate," the fund stated. "While Q1's 'SaaSpocalypse' narrative and Q2's enterprise software spend uncertainty drove aggressive spread widening, the Q3 landscape has shifted meaningfully."

What the numbers show

A divergence exists between Goldman’s organic liquidity management and its peers' forced caps. While Apollo, Cliffwater, Morgan Stanley, and Blackstone all hit the 5% redemption ceiling—indicating unmet demand exceeding 9% to 11% of assets—Goldman’s GS Credit fund absorbed requests at just 2% without needing to cap withdrawals. This suggests that Goldman’s specific investor mix, heavily weighted toward long-horizon private wealth clients, provided structural stability absent in funds with broader retail or institutional bases. Additionally, the fund reported an approximate 9.4% total return for Class I shares since inception through August 31, 2026.

Disclaimer: This article is AI-generated using data from ViewTrade. ScanX is not liable for any inaccuracies.

Will the divergence in redemption rates between Goldman Sachs and its peers prompt other asset managers to restructure their investor bases toward private wealth clients to enhance liquidity stability?

How might the moderation of the 'SaaSpocalypse' narrative in Q3 influence future underwriting standards and spread pricing for software-focused credit deals in 2027?

Given that peers like Apollo and Blackstone continue to hit redemption caps, what regulatory or structural changes might emerge to address the liquidity mismatch in non-traded private credit funds?

like16
dislike

Goldman Sachs Q3FY26 Results: EPS seen at $15.39, revenue at $17.42 billion

scanx
Reviewed by
Naman SScanX News Team
Key Highlights
  • Goldman Sachs Q3 earnings due October 13 with EPS forecast at $15.39
  • Revenue consensus at $17.42 billion versus $15.18 billion prior year
  • Analysts split on price targets: Wells Fargo cut to $1,175, Evercore raised to $1,210
  • Board discussing succession plan for CEO David Solomon to COO John Waldron
powered bylight_fuzz_icon
52232381

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

The Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE: GS) is scheduled to release its third-quarter earnings report before the opening bell on Tuesday, October 13.

Analysts expect the New York-based bank to report quarterly earnings of $15.39 per share, up from $12.25 per share in the year-ago period. The consensus estimate for Goldman’s quarterly revenue stands at $17.42 billion, compared to $15.18 billion reported last year.

Analyst revisions and price targets

Ahead of the earnings call, several high-accuracy analysts have adjusted their price targets while maintaining their ratings. The following table summarizes recent changes from key analysts:

Analyst Firm Rating Action New Price Target Accuracy
Mike Mayo Wells Fargo Overweight Cut $1,175 74%
Erika Najarian UBS Neutral Raised $1,150 63%
Brennan Hawken BMO Capital Market Perform Slashed $1,150 71%
Glenn Schorr Evercore ISI Outperform Raised $1,210 68%
Keith Horowitz Citigroup Neutral Boosted $1,200 80%

What the Numbers Show

A divergence exists between revenue growth expectations and analyst sentiment. While consensus forecasts indicate a robust 14.7% increase in revenue and a significant jump in EPS from $12.25 to $15.39, three of the five listed analysts either cut or slashed their price targets in July and September. This suggests that despite strong projected financial performance, concerns regarding valuation or future guidance may be tempering upside potential in analyst models.

Leadership and market context

The company’s board has reportedly discussed a succession plan in which CEO David Solomon would step down and hand the top job to President and Chief Operating Officer John Waldron.

Goldman Sachs shares fell 2.1% to close at $916.28 on Monday.

Disclaimer: This article is AI-generated using data from ViewTrade. ScanX is not liable for any inaccuracies.

How might the reported leadership succession plan involving John Waldron influence Goldman Sachs' long-term strategic direction and investor confidence?

What specific factors are driving the divergence between strong consensus revenue forecasts and the recent downward revisions in price targets by key analysts?

To what extent could a potential earnings beat or miss relative to the $15.39 EPS estimate impact Goldman Sachs' stock valuation given its current trading level?

like18
dislike

More News on Goldman Sachs