Gogia Capital Growth Limited adopted its audited standalone financial statements for FY26 during its 32nd Annual General Meeting held on September 29, 2026. The meeting also approved the appointment of M/s R. K. Sri & Co. as the new statutory auditors and regularised the reclassification of promoter status.

The AGM was chaired by Independent Director Shubham Aggarwal via video conferencing. Due to a technical glitch preventing his audio from unmuted, Company Secretary Bharti Rana read out the agenda items while the requisite quorum remained present throughout the proceedings.

Governance and board changes

Shareholders approved the re-appointment of Executive Managing Director Ankur Gogia and Executive Director Brijesh Saxena, both retiring by rotation. Additionally, the meeting regularised the appointment of two independent directors for five-year terms:

• Shubham Aggarwal (DIN: 11441503)
• Mansi Kabra (DIN: 11917058)

The company also approved managerial remuneration of up to ₹1.68 crore per annum for the Managing Director and Executive Directors, within limits prescribed under the Companies Act, 2013.

Auditor appointment and promoter reclassification

Members appointed M/s R. K. Sri & Co., Chartered Accountants (FRN 014141N), as statutory auditors for a term of five consecutive years. The firm replaces the previous auditor, who resigned citing pre-occupation and existing professional commitments. The incoming auditor has confirmed eligibility under Section 141 of the Companies Act, 2013 and is unrelated to any director or key managerial personnel.

A significant structural change involved the reclassification of promoter status pursuant to SEBI LODR Regulations:

Operational outlook

During the meeting, members were apprised of operational recovery and improvements witnessed over the preceding 5-6 months. The company indicated that subject to financial performance and regulatory compliance, it may consider recommending a dividend in the forthcoming financial year. Voting results were conducted through remote e-voting and will be submitted separately along with the scrutinizer's report.

Gogia Capital Growth Limited corrected its earlier disclosure regarding the board meeting held on September 25, 2026. The company stated that discussions concerning the resignation of Brijesh Saxena and the appointment of Natasha Gogia were not part of the formal agenda and were not approved by the Board.

This clarification follows a revised submission to the BSE, where the company apologized for an inadvertent oversight in mentioning verbal and casual discussions as official outcomes. The final outcome now strictly reflects the noting of independent director resignations and other non-material matters.

Clarification on earlier submission

The Board issued a correction stating that previous disclosures included details about proposed changes in leadership that were merely discussed casually. These items were not considered or approved during the meeting. The revised outcome is now treated as the final and accurate record for the meeting held on September 25, 2026.

Noting of independent director resignations

The primary official action recorded was the Board’s acknowledgment of the resignations of two Independent Directors, effective August 31, 2026. Both directors had already intimated their resignations to the stock exchange on August 31, 2026.

• Rajat Raja Kothari (DIN: 09604960): Resigned citing increased professional commitments and time constraints.
• Aanal Mehta (DIN: 10409766): Resigned citing personal reasons.

Both directors confirmed that there were no material reasons for their departure other than those stated in their resignation letters.

Meeting details and governance context

The board meeting commenced at 3:00 pm and concluded at 3:30 pm. Apart from noting the independent director exits, the Board discussed other items with the permission of the Chair. The company confirmed that no material event requiring disclosure under Regulation 30 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015 arose from these additional discussions.

The shift from reporting specific executive changes to focusing solely on independent director exits highlights a stricter adherence to procedural accuracy in regulatory filings. While the earlier draft suggested a governance reshuffle involving the Managing Director’s family, the final record indicates that such changes have not yet been formally ratified by the Board.