Gerber says Tesla could double sales without Musk, warns on SpaceX merger
Ross Gerber of Gerber Kawasaki argues Tesla could double sales by refocusing on EVs and energy, criticizing Elon Musk's AI pivot and FSD timelines. He warns a SpaceX merger would dilute SpaceX shareholders due to Tesla's higher P/E ratio (150 vs 80) and values Tesla at $1.3T versus SpaceX's $2T.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Gerber Kawasaki co-founder Ross Gerber has publicly criticized Tesla Inc.’s strategic pivot toward artificial intelligence and robotics, arguing that the electric vehicle maker could double its sales if it returned to focusing solely on vehicles and energy storage. Speaking to Benzinga, Gerber expressed frustration with CEO Elon Musk’s long-standing promises regarding autonomous driving, noting that despite years of testing, the technology remains unproven in real-world scenarios such as construction zones.
Strategic Pivot Criticism
Gerber argued that Musk’s decision to move away from selling cars to the general public stems from personal branding issues rather than market demand. He proposed a strategy involving increased marketing spend, the reintroduction of the Model S, and the launch of a $25,000 vehicle to broaden appeal.
"There’s no more Elon, you know," Gerber said. "Now we’re selling cars... Tesla would do well."
He highlighted a divergence between Musk’s production targets and actual output, noting that while Musk predicted 20 million cars annually five years ago, Tesla is currently "stuck at two [million]." Gerber also criticized the company’s product lineup for lacking variety, pointing to a third-party wrap market as evidence that consumers desire differentiation beyond the standard three colors offered.
SpaceX Merger Valuation Concerns
Addressing speculation about a potential merger between Tesla and Space Exploration Technologies Corp., Gerber warned of significant valuation conflicts. He cited Tesla’s current market capitalization at $1.3 trillion against SpaceX’s valuation of nearly $2 trillion.
| Metric: | Tesla: | SpaceX: |
|---|---|---|
| Valuation: | $1.3 trillion | ~$2 trillion |
| Forward PE: | 150 | 80 |
Gerber stated that a merger would be dilutive to SpaceX shareholders because Tesla trades at a significantly higher forward price-to-earnings multiple (150) compared to SpaceX (80). He described the combined entity’s potential $4 trillion valuation as a "joke" and warned of legal challenges due to conflicts of interest involving Musk’s control over both boards.
What the Numbers Show
The disparity in forward P/E multiples highlights a fundamental valuation mismatch between the two entities. Tesla’s multiple of 150 implies the market prices in significant future growth from its AI and robotics ambitions, whereas SpaceX’s lower multiple of 80 reflects a different risk-return profile despite its higher absolute valuation. This gap suggests that any consolidation would require substantial equity issuance from SpaceX, potentially diluting existing holders if the market does not revalue the combined unit at Tesla’s premium multiple.
Autonomous Driving Challenges
Gerber shared personal experiences with Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) software, describing its performance in construction zones as "mayhem." He noted that the system struggles to interpret human gestures, such as people waving directions, unlike competitors like Alphabet Inc.’s Waymo, which opts to take longer detours to avoid complex intersections. He characterized Musk’s claims about imminent robotaxi deployment as "delusional," given the lack of functional autonomous cabs in major cities.
Outlook
Gerber concluded that Musk faces an "extremely challenging" period with simultaneous pressures on Starship development, FSD reliability, and car sales. He suggested that investors might benefit more from companies supplying infrastructure and equipment to Musk’s ventures rather than holding equity in Tesla or SpaceX directly.
How might Tesla's stock valuation adjust if the market begins to price the company strictly as an automaker rather than an AI and robotics conglomerate?
What specific regulatory or legal hurdles could prevent a merger between Tesla and SpaceX, particularly regarding Musk's dual board leadership?
If Tesla were to launch a $25,000 vehicle as suggested by Gerber, how would that impact its current gross margins and brand positioning?

































