Ganon Products reappoints Ravindra Gopale, approves FY26 AGM notice
- Board approved Director's Report and Secretarial Audit Report for FY25-26
- Ravindra Gopale reappointed as director retiring by rotation
- 41st AGM to be held via video conferencing with NSDL e-voting
- M/s. HRU & Associates appointed as scrutinizer for the meeting

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Ganon Products Limited’s Board of Directors approved the Director’s Report for FY25-26 and reappointed Ravindra Gopale as a director retiring by rotation during its meeting on September 7, 2026.
The board also sanctioned the draft notice for the company’s 41st Annual General Meeting, which will be conducted electronically via video conferencing or other audio-visual means.
Key Board Approvals
The meeting, chaired by Managing Director Abhijeet Kacharu Jagtap, concluded at 12:30 pm after commencing at noon in Mumbai. The directors approved several compliance and administrative matters essential for the upcoming shareholder meeting.
- Re-appointment of Ravindra Gopale (DIN: 09436362) as a director.
- Approval of the Secretarial Audit Report for FY25-26.
- Appointment of M/s. HRU & Associates as the scrutinizer for the AGM.
- Engagement of NSDL to facilitate e-voting for shareholders.
Regulatory Compliance
The disclosure was made in compliance with Regulation 30 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The company notified the BSE Limited regarding the outcome of the meeting.
Historical Stock Returns for Ganon Products
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -3.14% | -1.20% | -8.64% | -46.76% | -36.26% | 0.0% |
How might the reappointment of Ravindra Gopale influence Ganon Products' strategic direction and operational stability in the coming fiscal year?
What are the expected implications of conducting the 41st AGM entirely via electronic means for shareholder engagement and voting participation rates?
Are there any significant findings in the approved Secretarial Audit Report for FY25-26 that could impact future corporate governance practices?


































