EquipmentShare lawsuit names co-founder Schlacks over alleged hidden deals
The securities class action against EquipmentShare.com Inc. now includes Co-Founder William Schlacks as a defendant, alongside CEO Jabbok Schlacks and CFO David Marquardt. The lawsuit alleges that executives authorized IPO filings that omitted material information about related-party transactions involving founder-affiliated entities like EZ Equipment Zone and Bevel Financial. With shares down more than 34.5% from the IPO price and $77 million in alleged hidden benefits, investors face a September 21, 2026, deadline to appoint a lead plaintiff.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has expanded its securities class action against EquipmentShare.com Inc. (NASDAQ: EQPT) to name Co-Founder, President, and Director William (Willy) Schlacks as an individual defendant. The complaint alleges that Schlacks, along with Chief Executive Officer Jabbok Schlacks and Chief Financial Officer David Marquardt, authorized or signed the January 2026 IPO Registration Statement while omitting material facts about related-party transactions. Investors who purchased Class A common stock between January 23, 2026, and June 23, 2026, face potential losses as shares declined $8.44 per share, or more than 34.5%, from the $24.50 IPO price to a low of $16.06.
The litigation asserts claims under Section 15 of the Securities Act and Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, targeting control persons who allegedly exercised authority over misleading disclosures. The core allegation is that public filings stated related-party transactions would be terminated or substantially reduced before the offering, yet undisclosed dealings continued. These transactions involved entities affiliated with the company’s founders, specifically tied to the OWN Program and T3 platform, with at least $77 million in benefits flowing to these entities.
Key Allegations and Executive Liability
The lawsuit identifies specific founder-affiliated entities and programs central to the alleged misconduct. Plaintiffs argue that the OWN Program was used to direct fees and payments to related entities, including EZ Equipment Zone, Bevel Financial, and Armada Fleet Management. The complaint challenges statements that certain related-party transactions would be reduced, asserting that founder-affiliated entities remained tied to equipment sales, receivables, leases, and platform-related transactions throughout the class period.
| Allegation Category | Specific Claim | Named Defendants |
|---|---|---|
| Control Person Liability | Executives controlled SEC reports and IPO materials under Section 20(a). | Jabbok Schlacks, David Marquardt |
| Securities Act Liability | Signed/authorized IPO Registration Statement omitting material facts. | William Schlacks |
| Undisclosed Transactions | Continued dealings with founder-affiliated entities despite promises to reduce them. | EquipmentShare.com Inc. |
| Financial Impact | Investors suffered an $8.44 per-share decline (34.5%) from IPO price. | N/A |
| Hidden Benefits | At least $77 million in benefits flowed to founder-affiliated entities. | N/A |
Investors eligible for the class include those who purchased securities during the specified period. Serving as lead plaintiff is not required to share in any potential recovery, but interested parties must file their request by the September 21, 2026, deadline. Joseph E. Levi, Esq., can be reached at (212) 363-7500 or jlevi@levikorsinsky.com for information on joining the suit.
What the Numbers Show
The specification of $77 million in founder-affiliated transaction benefits provides a concrete metric for the alleged scale of undisclosed related-party activity. This figure, combined with the 34.5% share price decline, suggests that the market reaction was directly tied to the revelation of these structural conflicts of interest. The focus on both Section 15 and Section 20(a) liability indicates that plaintiffs’ counsel is pursuing individual accountability for senior executives, arguing that their authority over disclosures makes them personally liable for the alleged misstatements. For investors, this development highlights the risk of retroactive re-evaluation of IPO prospectus disclosures, which could lead to substantial damages if courts find the omissions were intentional or reckless.
How might the inclusion of William Schlacks as an individual defendant impact EquipmentShare's ability to secure future financing or maintain executive stability?
What are the potential implications for other recent IPOs in the equipment leasing sector if this case sets a precedent for strict liability regarding related-party transaction disclosures?
Could the alleged $77 million in undisclosed benefits to founder-affiliated entities trigger a broader regulatory review of EquipmentShare's internal controls and governance structures?




























