EquipmentShare.com Inc, a leading provider of connected jobsite technology and construction equipment rental services in the United States, will report its fiscal second quarter 2026 financial results after the market closes on Wednesday, August 12, 2026. The announcement marks the company’s latest update for investors regarding its operational and financial performance in the construction technology sector.

Management will host a conference call on Thursday, August 13, 2026, at 7:30 a.m. Central Time to discuss the quarterly results. The call aims to provide stakeholders with insights into the company's progress in transforming the construction industry through its proprietary T3 technology platform.

Conference Call Details

The conference call will be available live via webcast at ir.equipmentshare.com. Investors who prefer audio access can dial 585-542-9983 (local) or 833-461-5787 (toll-free). The meeting ID for both numbers is 290010130. A replay of the webcast will be hosted on the EquipmentShare investor relations website following the event.

About EquipmentShare

Founded in 2015 and headquartered in Columbia, Missouri, EquipmentShare operates as a nationwide construction technology and equipment solutions provider. The company focuses on empowering contractors, builders, and equipment owners with data-driven insights and innovative tools. Its comprehensive suite of solutions includes a fleet management platform, telematics devices, and an equipment rental marketplace designed to drive productivity and efficiency across the construction sector.

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has expanded its securities class action against EquipmentShare.com Inc. (NASDAQ: EQPT) to name Co-Founder, President, and Director William (Willy) Schlacks as an individual defendant. The complaint alleges that Schlacks, along with Chief Executive Officer Jabbok Schlacks and Chief Financial Officer David Marquardt, authorized or signed the January 2026 IPO Registration Statement while omitting material facts about related-party transactions. Investors who purchased Class A common stock between January 23, 2026, and June 23, 2026, face potential losses as shares declined $8.44 per share, or more than 34.5%, from the $24.50 IPO price to a low of $16.06.

The litigation asserts claims under Section 15 of the Securities Act and Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, targeting control persons who allegedly exercised authority over misleading disclosures. The core allegation is that public filings stated related-party transactions would be terminated or substantially reduced before the offering, yet undisclosed dealings continued. These transactions involved entities affiliated with the company’s founders, specifically tied to the OWN Program and T3 platform, with at least $77 million in benefits flowing to these entities.

Key Allegations and Executive Liability

The lawsuit identifies specific founder-affiliated entities and programs central to the alleged misconduct. Plaintiffs argue that the OWN Program was used to direct fees and payments to related entities, including EZ Equipment Zone, Bevel Financial, and Armada Fleet Management. The complaint challenges statements that certain related-party transactions would be reduced, asserting that founder-affiliated entities remained tied to equipment sales, receivables, leases, and platform-related transactions throughout the class period.

Investors eligible for the class include those who purchased securities during the specified period. Serving as lead plaintiff is not required to share in any potential recovery, but interested parties must file their request by the September 21, 2026, deadline. Joseph E. Levi, Esq., can be reached at (212) 363-7500 or jlevi@levikorsinsky.com for information on joining the suit.

What the Numbers Show

The specification of $77 million in founder-affiliated transaction benefits provides a concrete metric for the alleged scale of undisclosed related-party activity. This figure, combined with the 34.5% share price decline, suggests that the market reaction was directly tied to the revelation of these structural conflicts of interest. The focus on both Section 15 and Section 20(a) liability indicates that plaintiffs’ counsel is pursuing individual accountability for senior executives, arguing that their authority over disclosures makes them personally liable for the alleged misstatements. For investors, this development highlights the risk of retroactive re-evaluation of IPO prospectus disclosures, which could lead to substantial damages if courts find the omissions were intentional or reckless.