EID Parry Q1 Results: Consolidated PAT drops 42% YoY to ₹142 crore
EID Parry’s Q1FY27 results show a 42% YoY drop in consolidated PAT to ₹142 crore despite a 3.4% revenue increase to ₹9,017 crore. Standalone operations reported a loss of ₹89 crore, impacted by ₹19 crore in net impairment charges for PSRIPL. While the Farm Inputs division contributed ₹649 crore in LBIT, the Sugar and Distillery segments faced margin pressures and cost increases.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
EID Parry (India) Limited reported a significant contraction in profitability for the first quarter of fiscal year 2027 (Q1FY27), with consolidated profit after tax (PAT) falling 42% year-on-year to ₹142 crore. While consolidated revenue from operations grew 3.4% to ₹9,017 crore against ₹8,720 crore in the corresponding quarter of the previous year, earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) declined to ₹781 crore from ₹895 crore. The standalone business reported a loss after tax of ₹89 crore, compared to a loss of ₹28 crore in Q1FY26, primarily impacted by exceptional items including a net impairment charge of ₹19 crore on investments in its subsidiary, Parry Sugars Refinery India Private Limited (PSRIPL).
The Board of Directors, led by Whole-Time Director and Chief Executive Officer Muthiah Murugappan, approved the unaudited financial results on August 12, 2026. The results were reviewed by the Audit Committee and independently audited by Price Waterhouse Chartered Accountants LLP pursuant to Regulation 33 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The auditor’s report notes that the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Ind AS 34 and other generally accepted accounting principles in India.
Segment Performance
The Farm Inputs division, primarily through its subsidiary Coromandel International Limited, remained the primary profit driver, reporting a profit before interest and tax (LBIT) of ₹649 crore, down from ₹741 crore in the prior year quarter. Conversely, the Sugar & Biofuel division recorded an LBIT loss of ₹58 crore, widening from a loss of ₹30 crore previously. This deterioration was attributed to higher operational costs and one-time expenses that offset benefits from increased sales volumes.
| Segment | Metric | Q1FY27 (₹ Cr) | Q1FY26 (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farm Inputs | LBIT | 649 | 741 |
| Sugar & Biofuel | LBIT | (58) | (30) |
| Nutraceuticals | LBIT | 0.11 | (10) |
| Distillery | Profit | 9 | 20 |
The Distillery segment saw revenues decline 14% to ₹255 crore due to lower off-take of Extra Neutral Alcohol (ENA) by IMFL manufacturers in Tamil Nadu, resulting in a profit drop to ₹9 crore from ₹20 crore. Meanwhile, the Nutraceuticals division turned profitable, reporting an LBIT of ₹0.11 crore against a loss of ₹10 crore, driven by stronger performance from its US subsidiary, US Nutraceuticals Inc.
Standalone Operational Challenges
Standalone revenue from operations contracted 3% to ₹733 crore from ₹756 crore. The Sugar segment within the standalone books grew 18% to ₹410 crore, fueled by higher sales volumes, but this did not translate to margin improvement as operational costs rose. The Consumer Products Group (CPG) reported a sharp revenue decline to ₹94 crore from ₹188 crore, though management noted improved operating margins due to a recalibrated operating model focused on profitability over volume.
What the Numbers Show
A critical divergence exists between the company’s top-line growth and bottom-line performance. While consolidated revenue expanded, the EBITDA margin compressed significantly, dropping from approximately 10.3% in Q1FY26 to 8.7% in Q1FY27. This margin erosion is largely attributable to the underperformance of the Sugar & Biofuel and Distillery segments, which failed to leverage volume gains into profitability. Furthermore, the standalone entity’s reliance on exceptional items—specifically the reversal of financial guarantee provisions and impairment charges related to PSRIPL—highlights ongoing structural risks in the refinery business unit, which continues to weigh on overall group stability despite the robust performance of the Farm Inputs division.
Historical Stock Returns for EID Parry
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.03% | -3.81% | -1.55% | -16.39% | -32.73% | +99.12% |
What specific operational strategies is EID Parry implementing to reverse the widening LBIT losses in the Sugar & Biofuel division amidst rising costs?
How might the ongoing impairment charges and structural risks associated with Parry Sugars Refinery India Private Limited (PSRIPL) impact the company's long-term capital allocation decisions?
Given the 14% revenue decline in the Distillery segment due to lower ENA off-take, what are the projected trends for IMFL demand in Tamil Nadu for the remainder of FY27?


































