ED files PMLA complaint against Electrotherm and promoters
Electrotherm (India) Ltd disclosed that the ED filed a PMLA complaint against the company and promoters Shailesh Bhandari and Mukesh Bhandari in the Ahmedabad Special Court. The probe stems from a Bank of India complaint, leading to earlier searches and account freezes which are currently being challenged in court.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) has filed a formal complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) against electrotherm and two of its promoters, Shailesh Bhandari and Mukesh Bhandari. The ED submitted the complaint to the Special Court for PMLA Cases at Ahmedabad, marking a significant escalation in the regulatory probe that began with searches and account freezes earlier this year.
The complaint was filed under Section 44(1)(b) read with Section 45(1) of the PMLA. According to the disclosure made to the stock exchanges on August 4, 2026, the Ahmedabad court provided copies of the complaint to Electrotherm and Shailesh Bhandari on August 3, 2026. This action follows notices issued under Section 223 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS) for hearing on cognizance.
This development is part of an ongoing investigation triggered by a complaint from Bank of India. Previous disclosures dated January 17, 2025, January 31, 2025, June 18, 2025, and February 5, 2026, detailed the initial search conducted by the ED’s Zonal Office in Ahmedabad. Those actions resulted in the freezing of bank accounts belonging to both the company and Shailesh Bhandari.
Legal Challenges and Account Operations
Electrotherm and Shailesh Bhandari have actively contested the ED’s measures through judicial channels. They challenged the freezing of bank accounts before the Gujarat High Court and the PMLA Appellate Tribunal in New Delhi. Additionally, they sought the quashing of the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) registered by the ED before the Gujarat High Court. As of the latest update, these matters remain pending for further hearings.
Despite the frozen status of certain accounts, the company secured permission to operate its bank accounts based on orders passed by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court. This interim relief allowed business continuity while the legal proceedings continue. Furthermore, a seized car was released upon the submission of a Fixed Deposit Receipt (FDR) in favor of the ED.
Key Entities and Regulatory References
| Entity/Reference | Details |
|---|---|
| Regulation | Regulation 30 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015 |
| Act | Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) |
| Sections | Section 44(1)(b), Section 45(1) of PMLA |
| Court | Special Court for PMLA Cases, Ahmedabad |
| Accused | Electrotherm (India) Ltd, Shailesh Bhandari, Mukesh Bhandari |
| Complainant | Bank of India (original complaint) |
The filing underscores the serious nature of the allegations, as the ED has moved from investigation to prosecution by lodging a formal complaint before the special court. The outcome of the pending appeals regarding the ECIR and account freezes will likely influence the trajectory of the main PMLA trial.
Historical Stock Returns for Electrotherm
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.69% | -2.83% | -16.60% | +24.54% | +16.34% | +577.04% |
How might the formal filing of the PMLA complaint impact Electrotherm's stock price volatility and investor sentiment in the near term?
What are the potential implications for Electrotherm's operational liquidity if the Gujarat High Court denies further interim relief on account freezes?
Could this legal escalation affect Electrotherm's ability to secure new credit facilities or maintain existing banking relationships beyond the Bank of India?


































