DCW to contest ₹6.32 crore interest demand from port authority
DCW Limited is disputing a ₹6.32 crore demand for interest and GST from V.O. Chidambaranar Port Authority, arguing it violates a Madras High Court order. The demand includes ₹5.36 crore in interest and ₹96.40 lakh in GST, separate from the principal lease rent of ₹3.64 crore. The company intends to file a representation against the claim.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
DCW Limited plans to contest a demand of ₹6.32 crore raised by the V.O. Chidambaranar Port Authority for interest and Goods and Services Tax (GST) on lease rent. The company received the communication, dated June 11, 2026, on June 16, 2026. The demand pertains to lease rent for the period from 2014 onwards up to April 30, 2026. DCW contends that the levy of interest is not authorized by a previous order passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Madras.
The dispute stems from a Writ Petition (No. 20431 of 2014) filed by DCW challenging the revision in lease rent for periods between 2007 and 2014, and from 2014 onwards. On November 6, 2025, the High Court directed the company to pay ₹49,67,725 plus applicable GST for the 2007–2014 period in 24 equated monthly instalments. The court order stipulated that rent for the period from 2014 onwards would be determined and communicated by the Port Authority. However, the company asserts that the order does not permit the Port Authority to levy or recover interest.
Financial Implications
The Port Authority has demanded interest of ₹5,35,56,890 along with GST of ₹96,40,240, aggregating to ₹6,31,97,130. This amount is in addition to the lease rent of ₹3,64,01,370 (inclusive of GST) determined for the period from 2014 to April 30, 2026. DCW maintains that the demand for interest and GST is wholly unauthorised and untenable.
| Component | Amount |
|---|---|
| Interest | ₹5,35,56,890 |
| GST on Interest | ₹96,40,240 |
| Total Interest & GST Demand | ₹6,31,97,130 |
| Lease Rent (2014 onwards, incl. GST) | ₹3,64,01,370 |
Legal Response and Disclosure
DCW stated that it will submit an appropriate reply or representation to the Port Authority to contest the demand. The company reserves all its rights and remedies available under the law. The disclosure was submitted to the exchanges under Regulation 30 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The company attributed a delay in disclosure to the time required for internal review and legal assessment of the demand.
Historical Stock Returns for DCW
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +1.29% | +9.43% | +7.35% | -14.43% | -33.34% | +37.03% |
How will the legal costs associated with contesting this demand impact DCW's operational profitability in the upcoming fiscal year?
If the court rules against DCW, does the company have sufficient liquidity to pay the ₹6.32 crore demand without affecting its ongoing expansion plans?
Could this dispute lead to a renegotiation of the lease terms for the period beyond April 30, 2026?


































