CMI Ltd Q1FY26 Results: Net loss narrows 63% YoY to ₹128.51 lakh
- Net loss narrowed 63.4% YoY to ₹128.51 lakh in Q1FY26
- Revenue from operations fell 11.6% to ₹1,380.25 lakh
- Total expenses declined 20.9% due to lower raw material and other costs
- Company remains under CIRP with accumulated losses eroding net worth
- Auditors noted lack of verification for assets, liabilities, and inventory

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
CMI Limited reported a net loss of ₹128.51 lakh for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, a significant improvement from the ₹351.66 lakh loss recorded in the corresponding quarter of the previous year.
The company, which is currently undergoing a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, saw its revenue from operations decline to ₹1,380.25 lakh in Q1FY26, down from ₹1,561.22 lakh in Q1FY25.
Financial Performance
The Board of Directors (Power Suspended), acting under the authorization of Resolution Professional Deepak Maini, approved the unaudited financial results on September 11, 2026. The results were subject to a limited review by statutory auditors Kumar Pramod & Associates.
| Metric | Q1FY26 (₹ lakh) | Q1FY25 (₹ lakh) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from Operations | 1,380.25 | 1,561.22 | -11.6% |
| Total Income | 1,398.37 | 1,580.00 | -11.5% |
| Total Expenses | 1,526.89 | 1,931.66 | -20.9% |
| Net Profit / (Loss) | -128.51 | -351.66 | +63.4% |
Revenue from operations contracted by approximately 11.6% year-on-year. However, total expenses fell by a sharper margin of roughly 20.9%, driven primarily by a reduction in other expenses and employee benefits costs. This cost compression contributed to the narrowing of the net loss.
Key Operational Metrics
- Cost of raw materials consumed stood at ₹1,238.70 lakh, compared to ₹1,550.61 lakh in the prior year quarter.
- Employee benefits expenses decreased to ₹65.53 lakh from ₹89.76 lakh.
- Finance costs were minimal at ₹3.43 lakh, down from ₹5.13 lakh.
- Depreciation and amortization expenses remained relatively stable at ₹186.20 lakh.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between the decline in revenue (-11.6%) and the steeper decline in total expenses (-20.9%) highlights a contraction in operational scale alongside improved cost efficiency. The reduction in raw material consumption aligns with the lower revenue figure, suggesting reduced production volume or input costs. Meanwhile, the significant drop in 'other expenses' (from ₹89.79 lakh to ₹33.01 lakh) was a key driver in limiting the bottom-line loss, indicating potential streamlining of non-core operational outlays during the insolvency process.
Auditor Observations
Kumar Pramod & Associates issued a limited review report with several matters requiring attention:
- Going Concern: Accumulated losses amounting to ₹16,375.79 lakh have eroded the company's net worth against a paid-up capital of ₹1,603.07 lakh.
- Accounting Standards: The financial statements were prepared under generally accepted accounting principles in India, not Ind AS.
- Verification Gaps: Confirmations for bank accounts, loans, and investments were unavailable. Fixed asset registers and inventory quantitative details were also not provided for verification.
- Contingent Liabilities: Potential liabilities related to income tax, TDS disputes, and GST could not be ascertained due to lack of available details.
The company continues to operate under the guidance of the Resolution Professional, with the board's powers suspended as per the IBC.
How might the significant reduction in employee benefits and raw material costs impact CMI Limited's production capacity and ability to fulfill existing orders during the CIRP?
What is the current timeline for the Resolution Professional to submit a viable resolution plan, and how does the narrowing net loss influence creditor confidence in this process?
Given the auditor's inability to verify bank accounts, loans, and contingent liabilities, what risks do these verification gaps pose to potential acquirers or investors in the resolution process?



























