Surbhi Jain resigned as Company Secretary and Compliance Officer of Cerebra Integrated Technologies Limited effective September 30, 2026. The departure was attributed to relocation and family commitments.

The company filed the necessary intimation under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 with both the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) and the National Stock Exchange of India (NSE). The filing was signed by Vishwamurthy Phalanetra, Whole Time Director, on October 1, 2026.

Resignation details

Jain tendered her resignation to the Board of Directors on September 30, 2026. In her letter, she expressed gratitude for the support and guidance received during her tenure. She requested the Board to accept the resignation and arrange for the requisite statutory filings.

The company disclosed that the reason for the cessation was personal, specifically citing relocation and family commitments. No other reasons were provided in the regulatory filing.

Regulatory compliance

The disclosure was made in compliance with SEBI Listing Regulations and SEBI Circular No. CIR/CFD/CMD/4/2015 dated September 9, 2015. The following table summarizes the key details disclosed:

The company confirmed that the disclosures required under Regulation 30 read with Part A, Para A of Schedule III of the SEBI Listing Regulations have been made. The Board accepted the resignation, and the matter was taken on record by the exchanges.

Cerebra Integrated Technologies Limited passed both ordinary resolutions at its 32nd Annual General Meeting (AGM) held on September 29, 2026, via Video Conferencing (VC). The voting results, declared by Whole-time Director and CFO Vishwamurthy Phalanetra, confirmed the adoption of financial statements and the re-appointment of a director with requisite majority support.

The meeting commenced at 4:00 pm and concluded at 4:24 pm with 115 members present. It was conducted in compliance with General Circular No 03/2025 dated September 22, 2025, issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), which permits companies to conduct AGMs through VC or Other Audio-Visual Means (OAVM) till further orders. The meeting also adhered to applicable provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and circulars issued by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI).

Meeting proceedings

Mr. Ranganathan V, Chairman and Managing Director, chaired the meeting. After confirming the presence of requisite quorum, the Chairman welcomed all members, directors, and other invitees. The notice convening the meeting was taken as read with the consent of members. The Chairman informed members that the Statutory Auditor's Report contains certain qualifications and observations, for which detailed explanations and clarifications from the management have been duly furnished. He then delivered his opening address, followed by operational and financial highlights of the company.

Voting results

Members were provided the facility to cast votes through remote e-voting as well as e-voting through Central Depository Services (India) Limited (CDSL) during the AGM. Mr. Parameshwar G. Bhat was appointed as the Scrutinizer to supervise the e-voting process. The scrutinizer’s report, dated September 30, 2026, confirmed that 53 members cast votes through remote e-voting and one member voted through e-voting at the AGM.

Resolution 1: Adoption of financial statements

The first resolution sought to receive, consider, and adopt the standalone and consolidated financial statements including the audited balance sheet as at March 31, 2026, statement of profit and loss for the year ended on that date, along with the Auditors' Report and Board's Report including Secretarial Audit Report.

Resolution 2: Re-appointment of Director

The second resolution concerned the re-appointment of Mr. Jignesh Mehta Jaswantra (DIN: 03079663), Non-Executive Director, who retired by rotation and being eligible, offered himself for re-appointment.

Both resolutions were deemed to have been passed by requisite majority. The votes cast by two bodies corporate were considered invalid as they did not submit supporting authorization to exercise their votes.