Cera Sanitaryware revenue rises 19.5% in Q1FY27; reaffirms margin guidance
Cera Sanitaryware delivered strong top-line growth in Q1 FY27 with revenue rising 19.5% to ₹486 crore, supported by volume gains in sanitaryware and faucetware. However, EBITDA margins contracted to 10.1% from 13.1% due to elevated gas and brass costs, one-time wage settlements, and lower fixed-cost absorption. Management expects margins to recover in subsequent quarters as price hikes take effect and operations normalize, reaffirming full-year FY27 guidance.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Cera Sanitaryware Limited reported a 19.5% year-on-year rise in revenue to ₹486 crore for Q1 FY27, driven by strong volume growth across its core sanitaryware and faucetware segments. Despite the top-line surge, EBITDA margins contracted to 10.1% from 13.1% in the corresponding quarter of the previous year, primarily due to elevated input costs, one-time wage settlements, and lower fixed-cost absorption. Management reaffirmed its full-year FY27 revenue growth guidance of 18%–20% and EBITDA margin target of 13.5%–14%, citing expected margin recovery as price hikes take effect and operational disruptions normalize.
The earnings conference call, held on August 8, 2026, provided detailed insights into the quarter’s performance under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The transcript reveals that while revenue grew significantly, profitability was impacted by transitional factors not expected to recur beyond Q2. These include a ₹6.3 crore provision for long-term worker settlements pertaining to the previous period, under-absorption of fixed costs due to temporary gas supply issues affecting kiln operations, and delayed realization of price increases in project contracts.
Financial Performance and Margin Dynamics
Revenue from operations stood at ₹486 crore in Q1 FY27, compared to ₹407 crore in Q1 FY26. The company noted a change in accounting presentation where turnover discounts are now deducted from revenue rather than shown as expenses, reducing reported revenue by approximately 2.5% compared to prior year restatements. This change does not impact absolute profitability or cash flows.
EBITDA excluding other income was ₹49.2 crore, down from ₹53.1 crore in Q1 FY26. Profit after tax (PAT) declined slightly to ₹45 crore from ₹47 crore in the previous year, with earnings per share (EPS) at ₹35.15 versus ₹36.08 earlier.
| Metric | Q1 FY27 | Q1 FY26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from Operations | ₹486 crore | ₹407 crore | +19.5% |
| EBITDA (excl. other income) | ₹49.2 crore | ₹53.1 crore | -7.3% |
| EBITDA Margin | 10.1% | 13.1% | -300 bps |
| PAT | ₹45 crore | ₹47 crore | -4.3% |
| EPS | ₹35.15 | ₹36.08 | -2.6% |
Management attributed the margin compression to several one-time factors totaling a ~4.35% impact. A ₹6.3 crore long-term settlement (LTS) for workers accounted for a 1.3% hit. Operating with a single kiln during parts of March, April, and May led to ₹3.7 crore in under-absorbed fixed costs (0.75% impact). Additionally, accelerating deliveries against older project contracts before price revisions took effect resulted in a ₹4 crore profit impact (0.8%).
Segment Growth and Operational Updates
Growth was broad-based, with Sanitaryware contributing 47% and Faucetware 40% of total revenue. Sanitaryware revenue grew 14% YoY, driven largely by volume (10%) with minor contributions from price (2%) and mix (2%). Faucetware saw robust 25% growth, with volume contributing 18%, price 4%, and mix 3%. Tiles grew 22%, while Wellness declined 7%.
Capacity utilization stood at 61% for sanitaryware, constrained by the single-kiln operation, while faucetware utilization reached 96%. The company is internalizing certain SKUs previously outsourced from the Morbi cluster to mitigate supply chain risks, requiring minimal investment of ₹2–3 crore. This strategic shift aims to enhance control over complex SKUs while maintaining outsourcing for simpler components.
Cost Pressures and Pricing Strategy
Input cost inflation remained a key challenge. Gas costs averaged ₹48.43 per cubic meter, up from ₹33.17 in Q1 FY26, accounting for ~3.3% of revenue. Brass prices rose steadily, reaching ~₹900 per kg in July 2026 from ~₹665 in December 2025. In response, Cera implemented cumulative price hikes of ~12% in Sanitaryware and ~16% in Faucetware since March 2026. These increases have been well-absorbed in retail but will reflect in project revenues only post-Q2 as old contracts close out.
Working capital efficiency improved significantly, with inventory days dropping from 80 to 68, receivables from 38 to 30, and payables rising from 43 to 48 days. Net working capital cycle improved from 75 to 50 days. Cash and cash equivalents stood at ₹943 crore as of June 30, 2026.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between strong revenue growth and compressed margins highlights the transitional nature of Q1 FY27 results. While input cost inflation and one-time settlements pressured short-term profitability, the underlying volume-led demand remains robust. Management’s confidence in returning to 13.5%–14% EBITDA margins for FY27 hinges on the full realization of price hikes in project segments and normalization of production capacity. The strategic move to internalize key SKUs and improve working capital positions the company to better navigate future supply chain and cost volatility, supporting long-term margin resilience despite near-term headwinds.
Historical Stock Returns for Cera Sanitaryware
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.37% | +0.38% | -9.51% | +18.78% | -9.90% | +30.76% |
How might the ongoing rise in brass and gas prices impact Cera's ability to sustain the targeted 13.5%–14% EBITDA margins if input cost inflation accelerates further in H2 FY27?
What is the expected timeline and operational impact of internalizing SKUs from the Morbi cluster, and will this shift significantly alter the company's cost structure or supply chain resilience?
Given the 16% price hike in Faucetware, how vulnerable is Cera's volume growth to potential demand elasticity or increased competition from lower-cost domestic rivals?


































