CCL International discloses related party transactions for second half of FY26
CCL International Limited disclosed related party transactions for the second half-year ended March 31, 2026, detailing loans, interest payments, rent, and director remuneration. The company reported outstanding credit balances with Tanvi Fincap Private Limited and Rama Anil Gupta Associates Private Limited. The filing was submitted to the Bombay Stock Exchange pursuant to SEBI regulations.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
CCL International Limited has disclosed its related party transactions for the second half-year ended March 31, 2026, to the Bombay Stock Exchange. The filing, submitted by Managing Director Akash Gupta, details financial interactions with various entities and individuals pursuant to Regulation 23(9) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The disclosure covers transactions such as loans, rent payments, and remuneration, along with outstanding balances as of the reporting date.
The company reported significant loan transactions with Tanvi Fincap Private Limited and Rama Anil Gupta Associates Private Limited. During the period from October 1, 2025, to March 31, 2026, CCL International borrowed ₹1,90,25,000.00 from Tanvi Fincap Private Limited, repaid ₹30,00,000.00, and paid interest amounting to ₹45,64,811.00. An outstanding balance of ₹9,47,04,674.00 was recorded as a credit with this entity. Similarly, the company took a loan of ₹50,00,000.00 from Rama Anil Gupta Associates Private Limited, repaid ₹10,52,280.00, and paid interest of ₹18,36,498.00, leaving a credit balance of ₹3,12,52,848.00.
Rent payments were made to M/s. Anil Kumar HUF and Mrs. Rama Gupta for premises located in Guwahati and Ghaziabad, respectively. The company paid ₹3,00,000.00 to M/s. Anil Kumar HUF and ₹9,00,000.00 to Mrs. Rama Gupta for the period. No outstanding balances were recorded for these rent transactions as of March 31, 2026.
Remuneration and Fees
The disclosure also outlines remuneration and fees paid to key management personnel and directors. Akash Gupta, Managing Director, received ₹12,00,000.00 as director remuneration. Pradeep Kumar, serving as Company Secretary, was paid a salary of ₹3,30,000.00. Additionally, sitting fees were disbursed to several directors, including Rajni Kant Gupta, Deepanshi Rajput, and Tarun Kumar Gupta.
Summary of Related Party Transactions
| S. No. | Name of the Parties | Nature of Transactions | Transaction Amount (In Rs.) From 01.10.2025 to 31.03.2026 | Outstanding Balance as at 31.03.2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | KPM-CCL (Partnership Firm) | Capital Contribution / Withdrawal | 0.00 | 9,07,569.67 Dr. |
| 2. | Tanvi Fincap Private Limited | Loan Taken / Repaid / Interest Paid / TDS Deducted | 1,90,25,000.00 / 30,00,000.00 / 45,64,811.00 / 4,56,481.00 | 9,47,04,674.00 Cr. |
| 3. | Rama Anil Gupta Associates Private Limited | Loan Taken / Repaid / Interest Paid / TDS Deducted | 50,00,000.00 / 10,52,280.00 / 18,36,498.00 / 1,83,650.00 | 3,12,52,848.00 Cr. |
| 4. | M/s. Anil Kumar HUF | Rent paid | 3,00,000.00 | 0.00 Cr. |
| 5. | Mrs. Rama Gupta | Rent paid | 9,00,000.00 | 0.00 Dr. |
| 6. | Mr. Akash Gupta | Director Remuneration | 12,00,000.00 | 0.00 Dr. |
| 7. | Mr. Pradeep Kumar | Salary (Company Secretary) | 3,30,000.00 | 0.00 Cr. |
| 8. | Mr. Rajni Kant Gupta | Director Sitting Fees | 2,500.00 | 0.00 Cr. |
| 9. | Ms. Deepanshi Rajput | Director Sitting Fees | 4,000.00 | 0.00 Cr. |
| 10. | Ms. Tarun Kumar Gupta | Director Sitting Fees | 4,000.00 | 0.00 Cr. |
Historical Stock Returns for CCL International
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.04% | -5.62% | -12.64% | -22.80% | -27.67% | +40.30% |
How does CCL International plan to manage the significant outstanding credit balances exceeding ₹12.5 crore with related party lenders in the upcoming fiscal year?
Will the company continue to rely heavily on related party financing, or are there strategies in place to diversify funding sources through banking institutions?
What is the interest rate structure for these related party loans, and how does it compare to prevailing market rates for corporate borrowing?





























