Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Company Limited has confirmed that its promoters and persons acting in concert did not create any encumbrance on shares during the financial year ended March 31, 2026. The disclosure was submitted to the stock exchanges to comply with regulatory requirements regarding shareholding patterns.

Nowrosjee Wadia & Sons Limited, on behalf of the promoters, communicated to BSE Limited and National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. that no shares were encumbered directly or indirectly in FY26. This confirmation was made pursuant to Regulation 31(4) of the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011.

The filing includes a comprehensive list of 118 entities identified as promoters and persons acting in concert. The list comprises individuals such as Nusli Neville Wadia and Ness Nusli Wadia, as well as corporate entities including The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Limited, Britannia Industries Limited, and Go Airlines (India) Limited.

The detailed annexure categorizes the shareholders, covering a wide range of investment and holding companies within the group. The confirmation ensures transparency regarding the status of the promoter shareholding for the specified financial year.

Bombay Dyeing has received a Goods and Services Tax (GST) order demanding Rs 6.14 Cr for the financial year 2018-19. The order, issued by the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Appeal, in Mumbai, pertains to GST demand on infrastructure charges received by the company relating to the sale of flats.

The demand was raised under Section 107 of the MGST Act 2017. It quantifies the total liability at Rs 6,14,38,106, comprising a GST amount of Rs 1,91,82,656, interest of Rs 2,30,72,794, and a penalty of Rs 1,91,82,656. The company received the communication via a system-generated email on June 18, 2026.

Details of the GST Demand

The breakdown of the demand raised by the GST authority is detailed below:

Company Response and Impact

While the order carries a financial impact, Bombay Dyeing stated that its operations and other activities remain unaffected beyond this monetary implication. The company has disclosed that it will file a necessary appeal against the order with the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) within the permissible timeline.

The disclosure was made to the exchanges in compliance with Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.