Rohit Kedia re-appointment rejected at Baazar Style Retail AGM
- Rohit Kedia's re-appointment as director was rejected at Baazar Style Retail's 13th AGM, with 77.7591% of votes cast against the resolution
- The promoter and promoter group voted 67.9299% against Kedia's re-appointment, while public non-institutional holders voted 98.6972% against
- Three other resolutions passed with over 99.99% approval, including adoption of FY26 financial statements and appointment of Harish Chander Khurana as Independent Director for five years
- Total votes polled across all resolutions stood at 35,434,152, representing 46.55% of 76,117,353 outstanding shares
- Shreyans Surana's re-appointment as Chairman and Managing Director was approved with 99.9993% votes in favour

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Baazar Style Retail Limited concluded its 13th Annual General Meeting on September 25, 2026, passing three of four resolutions, with the re-appointment of director Rohit Kedia notably failing after 77.76% of votes were cast against the resolution.
The meeting was held via video conferencing from 11:00 am to 12:08 pm, in compliance with the Companies Act, 2013 and SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. A total of 212 members representing 48,58,819 shares attended the meeting. The cut-off date for voting eligibility was September 18, 2026, on which 53,101 shareholders were on record. Remote e-voting ran from September 22, 2026 at 9:00 am to September 24, 2026 at 5:00 pm, with additional e-voting available during the AGM. A total of 35,434,152 votes were polled across 184 folios, representing 46.55% of outstanding shares.
Voting results at a glance
The scrutinizer's consolidated report, submitted by CS Sanjay Kumar Joshi of S. K. Joshi & Associates on September 25, 2026, confirmed the outcome of all four resolutions. Three resolutions were passed with requisite majority, while Resolution 3 — the re-appointment of Rohit Kedia — was defeated.
| Resolution | Description | Type | Result | Votes in favour (%) | Votes against (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adoption of standalone and consolidated financial statements for FY26 | Ordinary | Passed | 99.9996% | 0.0004% |
| 2 | Re-appointment of Shreyans Surana, liable to retire by rotation | Ordinary | Passed | 99.9993% | 0.0007% |
| 3 | Re-appointment of Rohit Kedia, liable to retire by rotation | Ordinary | Not passed | 22.2409% | 77.7591% |
| 4 | Appointment of Harish Chander Khurana as Independent Director for five years | Special | Passed | 99.9995% | 0.0005% |
Resolution-wise voting breakdown
For Resolution 1, the adoption of FY26 financial statements, total votes polled stood at 35,434,152 out of 76,117,353 shares. Promoter and promoter group votes were entirely in favour, while public non-institutional holders cast 125 votes against out of 13,608,798 polled.
Resolution 2, the re-appointment of Shreyans Surana as Chairman and Managing Director, received near-unanimous support. Of 35,434,152 votes polled, 35,433,888 were in favour and 264 against. The promoter group, which holds 29,206,984 shares, voted entirely in favour.
Resolution 3, the re-appointment of Rohit Kedia, was the sole resolution to fail. The promoter and promoter group voted 14,121,768 shares against and only 6,666,962 in favour, representing 67.93% against within the promoter category. Public non-institutional holders voted 13,431,501 shares against and only 177,297 in favour. Public institutional holders were the only category to vote entirely in favour with 1,036,624 votes. In aggregate, 27,553,269 votes were cast against the resolution versus 7,880,883 in favour.
Resolution 4, the special resolution to appoint Harish Chander Khurana (DIN: 11473818) as an Independent Director for a first term of five consecutive years, passed with 99.9995% of votes in favour. Of 35,434,152 votes polled, 35,433,988 were in favour and only 164 against.
Detailed vote summary for Resolution 3 (Rohit Kedia)
| Category | Shares held | Votes polled | Votes in favour | Votes against | % in favour | % against |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter and promoter group | 29,206,984 | 20,788,730 | 6,666,962 | 14,121,768 | 32.0701% | 67.9299% |
| Public institutional holders | 2,455,910 | 1,036,624 | 1,036,624 | 0 | 100.0000% | 0.0000% |
| Public others | 44,454,459 | 13,608,798 | 177,297 | 13,431,501 | 1.3028% | 98.6972% |
| Total | 76,117,353 | 35,434,152 | 7,880,883 | 27,553,269 | 22.2409% | 77.7591% |
Attendance and participation details
The company reported the following shareholder participation for the meeting:
| Metric | Count |
|---|---|
| Total shareholders on record | 53,101 |
| Members attending via VC/OAVM | 212 |
| Shares represented by attendees | 48,58,819 |
| Promoter group attendees | 3 |
| Public shareholders attending | 209 |
Management commentary and governance
Managing Director Shreyans Surana addressed members, highlighting the company's operational efficiency and robust financial performance during FY26. He emphasised a youth-centric fashion approach, technology-driven transformation, and supply chain effectiveness, reaffirming the company's commitment to sustainable growth and financial discipline.
The statutory auditors M/s Singhi & Co. and secretarial auditors S. K. Joshi & Associates were present virtually. MUFG Intime India Private Limited served as the registrar and transfer agent and facilitated the e-voting platform. The AGM notice was dispatched on September 3, 2026 by email to 51,917 shareholders who had registered their email IDs, while 2,185 shareholders without registered email IDs received a letter with a web-link to the annual report.
Historical Stock Returns for Baazar Style Retail
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +1.46% | -3.16% | -5.29% | +34.09% | +3.74% | -6.05% |
How will the board restructure its leadership and committee assignments to fill the vacancy left by Rohit Kedia's failed re-appointment?
What specific governance concerns or performance issues drove the significant dissent from public shareholders against Rohit Kedia's re-appointment?
Will the internal split within the promoter group regarding Rohit Kedia signal potential future conflicts or changes in Baazar Style's strategic direction?

































