Abbott settles Gill case and NEC claims for $670 million
- Abbott settles the Gill case and ~2,000 NEC claims for $670 million
- A St. Louis jury previously awarded $495 million in damages in July 2024
- The Missouri Court of Appeals denied Abbott's appeal in December 2024
- The settlement avoids paying ~$600 million for the Gill judgment plus interest

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Abbott has reached agreements with three law firms to resolve the Gill case and claims involving approximately 2,000 other individuals regarding its specialty formulas for preterm infants.
The company agreed to an aggregate settlement of approximately $670 million. This amount covers the resolution of the Gill case as well as necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) claims asserted on behalf of the additional infants.
Legal Background
In July 2024, a St. Louis jury awarded the plaintiff in the Gill case $495 million in damages. Abbott appealed this verdict to the Missouri Court of Appeals in December 2024, but the appeal was denied.
Faced with the prospect of continuing appeals or paying approximately $600 million—representing the Gill judgment plus accrued interest to date—Abbott opted for the settlement. The agreement resolves both the specific Gill judgment and the broader group of NEC claims.
What the Numbers Show
The settlement structure indicates a strategic decision to cap total liability. By settling the Gill case (valued at approximately $600 million with interest) alongside ~2,000 additional claims for a combined $670 million, the company effectively resolved the broader litigation exposure for a marginal premium over the standalone Gill obligation.
Historical Stock Returns for Abbott
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.42% | -5.03% | -7.23% | -0.25% | -19.53% | +37.51% |
How will the $670 million settlement impact Abbott's quarterly earnings and cash flow in the near term?
Will this resolution lead to any changes in Abbott's manufacturing processes or labeling for its specialty preterm infant formulas?
Are there potential regulatory investigations by the FDA or other health agencies triggered by the settlement terms?


































