Goldman Sachs forecasts Strait of Hormuz flow normalization by late 2027

scanx
Reviewed by
Ritika DScanX News Team
Key Highlights
  • Goldman Sachs predicts Strait of Hormuz flows will normalize by the second half of next year
  • Crude oil prices are expected to stabilize at $80/bbl following flow normalization
  • China faces a high probability of restricting product exports due to depleted domestic inventories
  • Restricting US diesel exports could lead to refinery run cuts and higher gasoline prices
powered bylight_fuzz_icon
52829823

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS) analyst Nikhil Bhandari stated that oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz are likely to stabilize in the second half of next year. This normalization is expected to result in crude oil prices settling around $80/bbl.

In an interview with CNBC on Monday, Bhandari noted that oil flows out of the Middle East have reportedly exceeded pre-war levels. He explained that refineries outside the Middle East and Russia would reach maximum stretch levels by March next year. Conversely, refinery operations within the Middle East and Russia could take longer to recover due to infrastructure damage.

Market Dynamics and Pricing

The analyst highlighted that despite the stabilization of flow volumes, the crack spread, which represents the profit refineries earn from converting crude oil into fuel, must remain significantly higher than the usual $20 spread. Bhandari attributed recent increases in oil movement partly to dark fleet activity.

Policy Restrictions and Supply Risks

Bhandari addressed the potential impact of government interventions on fuel markets, specifically regarding diesel export bans considered by the Trump administration. While President Donald Trump later ruled out a ban, he signed an executive order allowing the temporary sale of red-dyed diesel for highway use to address high fuel prices.

Regarding global supply constraints, the analyst identified a high probability that China would restrict its product exports. He cited heavily depleted domestic product inventories within China as the primary driver for this potential shift in focus away from exports.

US Refinery Implications

In the United States context, Bhandari warned that restricting exports could inadvertently pressure gasoline prices upward. He noted that limiting the 1.5 million barrels of daily exports would likely force refinery run cuts, thereby reducing domestic supply availability.

Key Forecasts

Factor Forecast / Status
Flow Normalization Second half of next year
Crude Oil Price Target $80/bbl
Crack Spread Requirement Much higher than $20
China Export Risk High probability of restrictions
US Daily Exports at Risk 1.5 million barrels

The divergence between volume recovery and price stability suggests that logistical bottlenecks and refining capacity constraints will continue to support elevated margins even as physical supply routes reopen.

Disclaimer: This article is AI-generated using data from ViewTrade. ScanX is not liable for any inaccuracies.

How might sustained crack spreads above $20/bbl influence long-term investment decisions in global refining capacity expansion?

What specific policy mechanisms or trade agreements could the US leverage to mitigate gasoline price spikes if China restricts product exports?

To what extent will 'dark fleet' activity continue to distort official supply data and impact market transparency as flows normalize?

like15
dislike

Trump says lack of refineries is the problem

scanx
Reviewed by
Ritika DScanX News Team
Key Highlights
  • Trump identified a lack of refineries as the core problem
  • No additional data, figures, or policy details were provided with the statement
powered bylight_fuzz_icon
52773955

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Trump stated that "a lack of refineries is the problem," pointing to refinery infrastructure as a central concern in the energy landscape.

Trump's statement on refinery shortfall

The remark draws attention to refinery capacity as a structural issue within the energy sector. No additional context, data, or figures were provided alongside the statement.

Disclaimer: This article is AI-generated using data from LiveSquawk. ScanX is not liable for any inaccuracies.

What specific policy incentives or regulatory changes might the administration propose to accelerate new refinery construction?

How could a renewed focus on domestic refining capacity impact long-term crude oil export volumes?

Will major energy companies revise their capital expenditure plans to prioritize downstream infrastructure over upstream exploration?

like15
dislike

More News on Crude Oil